The Association of Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Biology Among Breast Cancer Women in Jordan Mammographic density and BC biology

Hamzeh Al-Balas (1), Mahmoud AL-Balas (2), Shatha Herz Allah (3), Azmi Qudsi (4), Moh'd Shafiq Ramadan (5), Ghadeer Al Tawil (6), Haneen Baydoun (7)
(1) Department of General Surgery, Anesthesia and Urology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan, Jordan,
(2) Department of General Surgery, Anesthesia and Urology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan, Jordan,
(3) Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan, Jordan,
(4) Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan, Jordan,
(5) Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan, Jordan,
(6) Prince Hamza Hospital, Amman, Jordan, Jordan,
(7) Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan, Jordan

Abstract

Background: A breast mammogram is considered the gold standard modality for breast cancer screening. The sensitivity of breast mammograms is highly linked to mammographic breast density (MBD) which is strongly linked to women's age, ethnicity, and other factors.  Higher breast density is considered one of the risk factors for breast cancer development and it can be associated with different pathological and biological features of breast cancer.


Methods: This is a retrospective review of 97 women with a diagnosis of breast cancer in a tertiary hospital in Jordan who were diagnosed in the period between 2018 and 2020. We compared patients with a positive status for estrogen (ER) or progesterone (PR) receptors (ER+/PR+) and others with negative receptors (ER-/PR-), in terms of their correlation with MBD.


Results: The analysis has included 97 patients. Of which, 87.6% had either a PR+ or an ER+, and 38.1% of patients were positive for HER2/neu protein. The sample mean age was 56.4 and most patients were obese (56.7%). MBD of our cohort was 30.9% (30/97) fatty, 29.9% (29/97) scattered, 23.7% (23/97) heterogeneously dense, and 15.5% (15/97) dense. The ER+/PR+ group was more associated with fatty (35.3% vs 0.0%) and scattered (31.8% vs 25.0%) MBD types than the ER-/PR- group, and less associated with the dense type (9.4% vs 58.3%), and the association was statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, no statistically significant correlation was found between MBD and the HER2/neu protein status.


Conclusion: According to our results, ER+/PR+ group patients tend to have fatty and scattered MBD types than the ER-/PR- patients. Larger randomized cohorts should investigate the association between breast cancer biological subtypes and MBD.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov 1;68(6):394–424. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3322/caac.21492

Gold RH. THE EVOLUTION OF MAMMOGRAPHY. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan 1;30(1):1–19.

Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L. Evaluation of Periodic Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography: Methodology and Early Observations. JAMA. 1966 Feb 28;195(9):731–8. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/658376

Wolfe JN. RISK FOR BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENT DETERMINED BY MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERN. Available from: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142

Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. doi:102214/ajr12661130

McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2006 Jun 1;15(6):1159–69. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/15/6/1159/284551/Breast-Density-and-Parenchymal-Patterns-as-Markers

Antoni S, Sasco AJ, dos Santos Silva I, McCormack V. Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan 13;137(2):337–47. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-012-2362-4

NF B, H G, LJ M, L S, J S, E F, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):60–1. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17229950/

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459169/

Kim S, Tran TXM, Song H, Park B. Microcalcifications, mammographic breast density, and risk of breast cancer: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 1;24(1):96. Available from: https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13058-022-01594-0

Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Annals of Oncology. 2013 Sep 1;24(9):2206–23.

Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk1. doi:101148/radiol2301020870

Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of Assigned BI-RADS Breast Density Category Definitions. Acad Radiol. 2006 Sep 1;13(9):1143–9.

Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. The Breast. 2005 Aug 1;14(4):269–75.

Freer PE. Mammographic Breast Density: Impact on Breast Cancer Risk and Implications for Screening. doi:101148/rg352140106

Al-Mousa DS, Alakhras M, Spuur KM, Alewaidat H, Abdelrahman M, Rawashdeh M, et al. The implications of increased mammographic breast density for breast screening in Jordan. J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Dec 1;67(4):277–83. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmrs.414

Salem C, Atallah D, Safi J, Chahine G, Haddad A, el Kassis N, et al. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Incidence in the Lebanese Population: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017.

SPSS Statistics | IBM. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics

Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, Olshan AF, Yankaskas BC, Millikan RC. Association between mammographic density and basal-like and luminal A breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Research. 2013 Sep 4;15(5):1–10. Available from: https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/bcr3470

Posso M, Louro J, Sánchez M, Román M, Vidal C, Sala M, et al. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes? Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan 1;110:81–7.

Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson ANA, Sprague BL, Tice JA, Lehman CD, et al. Identifying Women With Dense Breasts at High Risk for Interval Cancer. doi:107326/M14-1465

Aiello EJ, Buist DSM, White E, Porter PL. Association between Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2005 Mar 1;14(3):662–8. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/14/3/662/169565/Association-between-Mammographic-Breast-Density

Arora N, King TA, Jacks LM, Stempel MM, Patil S, Morris E, et al. Impact of breast density on the presenting features of malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct 19;17(SUPPL. 3):211–8. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-010-1237-3

Singh N, Joshi P, Gupta A, Marak JR, Singh DK. Evaluation of volumetric breast density as a risk factor for breast carcinoma in pre- and postmenopausal women, its association with hormone receptor status and breast carcinoma subtypes defined by histology and tumor markers. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2022 Dec 1;53(1):1–9. Available from: https://ejrnm.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43055-022-00759-3

Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, Wang Y, Bernstein L, Ursin G. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? luminal a and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2009 Feb 1;18(2):479–85. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/18/2/479/166709/Is-There-a-Difference-in-the-Association-between

Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, et al. Mammographic Breast Density and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women According to Tumor Characteristics. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2011 Aug 3;103(15):1179–89. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/103/15/1179/2516476

Sartor H, Zackrisson S, Elebro K, Hartman L, Borgquist S. Mammographic density in relation to tumor biomarkers, molecular subtypes, and mode of detection in breast cancer. Cancer Causes and Control. 2015 Jun 26;26(6):931–9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10552-015-0576-6

Ding J, Warren R, Girling A, Thompson D, Easton D. Mammographic Density, Estrogen Receptor Status and Other Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics. Breast J. 2010 May 1;16(3):279–89. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00907.x

Conroy SM, Pagano I, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Mammographic density and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Oct 1;35(5):448–52.

Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, Wang Y, Bernstein L, Ursin G. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? luminal a and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2009 Feb 1;18(2):479–85. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/18/2/479/166709/Is-There-a-Difference-in-the-Association-between

Phipps AI, Buist DSM, Malone KE, Barlow WE, Porter PL, Kerlikowske K, et al. Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Risk of Tumor Marker-Defined Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2012 May 1;22(5):340–8.

Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Wenkel E, Lux MP, Schrauder M, et al. Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Dec 1;60(3):398–404.

Aiello EJ, Buist DSM, White E, Porter PL. Association between Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2005 Mar 1;14(3):662–8. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/14/3/662/169565/Association-between-Mammographic-Breast-Density

Edwards BL, Atkins KA, Stukenborg GJ, Novicoff WM, Larson KN, Cohn WF, et al. The association of mammographic density and molecular breast cancer subtype. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2017 Oct 1;26(10):1487–92. Available from: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/26/10/1487/115592/The-Association-of-Mammographic-Density-and

Park IH, Ko K, Joo J, Park B, Jung SY, Lee S, et al. High Volumetric Breast Density Predicts Risk for Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal, but not Premenopausal, Korean Women. Ann Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2014 Oct 31 [cited 2023 Jan 16];21(13):4124–32. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-014-3832-1

Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MRE, et al. Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002 Sep 19;347(12):886–94. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa013390

Gierach GL, Brinton LA, Sherman ME. Lobular Involution, Mammographic Density, and Breast Cancer Risk: Visualizing the Future? JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2010 Nov 17;102(22):1685–7. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/22/1685/918577

Landgren BM, Collins A, Csemiczky G, Burger HG, Baksheev L, Robertson DM. Menopause Transition: Annual Changes in Serum Hormonal Patterns over the Menstrual Cycle in Women during a Nine-Year Period Prior to Menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun 1;89(6):2763–9. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/89/6/2763/2870318

Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Research 2008 10:1. 2008 Jan 9;10(1):1–14. Available from: https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/bcr183

Berg WA, Seitzman RL, Pushkin J. Implementing the National Dense Breast Reporting Standard, Expanding Supplemental Screening Using Current Guidelines, and the Proposed Find It Early Act. J Breast Imaging. 2023 Nov 30;5(6):712-723. doi:10.1093/jbi/wbad034.

Authors

Hamzeh Al-Balas
Mahmoud AL-Balas
mahmoud_albalas@hu.edu.jo (Primary Contact)
Shatha Herz Allah
Azmi Qudsi
Moh'd Shafiq Ramadan
Ghadeer Al Tawil
Haneen Baydoun
Author Biographies

Hamzeh Al-Balas , Department of General Surgery, Anesthesia and Urology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

Assistant Professor of Surgery

 

Mahmoud AL-Balas, Department of General Surgery, Anesthesia and Urology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

Associate Professor of Surgery

Department of General Surgery, Anesthesia and Urology, Faculty of medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13133, Jordan

1.
Al-Balas H, AL-Balas M, Herz Allah S, Qudsi A, Ramadan MS, Al Tawil G, Baydoun H. The Association of Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Biology Among Breast Cancer Women in Jordan: Mammographic density and BC biology. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 25 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];11(4). Available from: https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/982

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)