Foreign-Body Reaction Presenting as Persistent Postoperative Dermatitis Following Breast Expander Reconstruction Requiring Explantation: A Case Report Breast FBR

Juan Pablo Zaraza Duarte (1), María Alexandra Bernal Niño (2), Laura Alejandra Garzón Bautista (3), Ana María Arias Copete (4), Martha Lucía Cadena Lleras (5)
(1) Faculty of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Los Nogales, Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia,
(2) Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fundación Santafé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia,
(3) Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia; Department of Plastic Surgery, Clínica Los Nogales, Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia,
(4) Department of Breast Surgery, Clínica Los Nogales, Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia,
(5) Department of Pathology, Clinica Los Nogales, Bogotá, Colombia, Colombia

Abstract

Background: Foreign-body reaction (FBR) is an uncommon clinically significant complication of implant-based breast reconstruction. Persistent postoperative dermatitis may mimic more frequent complications such as infection, malignancy, lymphatic dysfunction, or hypersensitivity, making diagnosis challenging.


Case Presentation: A 48-year-old woman developed persistent pruritic dermatitis after immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander. The skin changes progressed despite antibiotic and topical corticosteroid therapy and remained unchanged after expander deflation. Infection, implant rupture, and malignancy were investigated and reasonably excluded. Explantation with total capsulectomy was subsequently performed as both a diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. Histopathological examination demonstrated a reactive lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with focal multinucleated foreign-body giant cells within the periprosthetic capsule, without microorganisms or malignancy. The dermatitis completely resolved following explantation.


Conclusion: Clinically significant FBR should be considered in patients with persistent postoperative dermatitis after implant-based breast reconstruction when more common etiologies have been reasonably excluded. Explantation may provide diagnostic clarification and therapeutic resolution in selected cases.

References

International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today.

Sbitany H. Breast reconstruction. Surg Clin North Am. 2018;98(4):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.03.011.

Malekpour M, Malekpour F, Wang HT-H. Breast reconstruction: review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(10):2201-12. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2201.

Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P, Raposio E. Tissue expansion for breast reconstruction: Methods and techniques. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;21:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.048.

Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20(2):86-100. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004.

Major MR, Wong VW, Nelson ER, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. The foreign body response: at the interface of surgery and bioengineering. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(5):1489-98. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001193.

Bosker HM, Terra JB, Stenekes MM. Breast implant causes allergic contact dermatitis or foreign body reaction? Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;7(1):108-11. doi: 10.1080/23320885.2020.1810578.

Rosen AC, Goh C, Lacouture ME, Mehrara BJ, Cordeiro PG, Myskowski PL. Post-reconstruction dermatitis of the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(10):1369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.012.

Dargan D, McGoldrick C, Khan K. Type IV hypersensitivity to a textured silicone breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):969-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.051.

Najafi M, Mohammadzadeh N, Neishaboury M. Acute immunologic reaction to silicone breast implant after mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Breast Cancer. 2014;1(2):73-76. doi: 10.19187/abc.20141273-76.

Jaffe ES, Ashar B, Clemens MW, Feldman AL, Gaulard P, Miranda RN, et al. Best practices guideline for the pathologic diagnosis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(10):1102-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02778.

Tanaka A, Yamashita C, Hinogami H, Shirai H, Yamamura J, Ito R. Localized cutaneous adverse event induced by anastrozole as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: a case report. Case Rep Dermatol. 2019;11(1):57-63. doi: 10.1159/000497469.

Authors

Juan Pablo Zaraza Duarte
juanzaraza.med@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
María Alexandra Bernal Niño
Laura Alejandra Garzón Bautista
Ana María Arias Copete
Martha Lucía Cadena Lleras
1.
Zaraza Duarte JP, Bernal Niño MA, Bautista LAG, Copete AMA, Lleras MLC. Foreign-Body Reaction Presenting as Persistent Postoperative Dermatitis Following Breast Expander Reconstruction Requiring Explantation: A Case Report: Breast FBR. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2026 Oct. 23];14(1). Available from: https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/1400

Article Details