Histopathological Upgrade in Papillary Breast Lesions Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Predictors and Clinical Implications from a Tertiary Care Cohort

Maleeha Khan Lodhi (1), Rufina Soomro (2)
(1) Department of Breast Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, Pakistan,
(2) Department of Breast Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College,National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Papillary breast lesions encompass a heterogeneous spectrum, and core needle biopsy (CNB) may underestimate in situ or invasive malignancy. We evaluated malignant upgrade and preoperative factors associated with upgrade after surgical excision.


Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified 298 patient records with papillary breast lesions. Eight patients without a preceding CNB, five without subsequent surgical excision, and one whose index papillary diagnosis and surgery occurred before the January 2019–December 2025 study period were excluded, leaving 284 patients for analysis. Malignant upgrade was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive malignancy on excision after a benign or atypical papillary lesion on CNB; atypical ductal hyperplasia alone was not considered malignant upgrade. Firth penalized logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted estimates in the presence of a highly predictive atypia variable.


Results: Malignant upgrade occurred in 137 of 284 patients (48.2%). Upgrade was observed in 130 of 150 lesions with atypia (86.7%) and 7 of 134 lesions without atypia (5.2%). In adjusted analysis (n=273 complete cases), atypia on CNB was the strongest independent predictor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 71.49, 95% CI 25.96–196.84; p<0.001). Increasing age (aOR 1.039 per year, 95% CI 1.006–1.072; p=0.021) and manual rather than ultrasound-guided core biopsy (aOR 5.01, 95% CI 1.46–17.20; p=0.010) also remained associated. Ultrasound lesion size, palpability, peripheral location, and BI-RADS ≥4 were not independently associated after adjustment.


Conclusion: Atypia on CNB was associated with a very high probability of malignant upgrade and supports surgical excision. The low upgrade rate among lesions without atypia is hypothesis-generating but cannot establish the safety of surveillance because only surgically excised lesions were analyzed.

References

Rakha EA, Ellis IO. Diagnostic challenges in papillary lesions of the breast. Pathology. 2018;50(1):100–110. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2017.10.005.

Wen X, Cheng W. Nonmalignant breast papillary lesions at core-needle biopsy: a meta-analysis of underestimation and influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(1):94–101. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2590-1.

Renshaw AA, Derhagopian RP, Tizol-Blanco DM, Gould EW. Papillomas and atypical papillomas in breast core needle biopsy specimens: risk of carcinoma in subsequent excision. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122(2):217–221. doi:10.1309/K1BNJXETEY3H06UL.

Sydnor MK, Wilson JD, Hijaz TA, Massey HD, Shaw de Paredes ES. Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2007;242(1):58–62. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421031988.

Ahmadiyeh N, Stoleru MA, Raza S, Lester SC, Golshan M. Management of intraductal papillomas of the breast: an analysis of 129 cases and their outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2264–2269. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0534-1.

Salisbury T, Gurung A, Koonmee S, et al. Upgrade rate and predictive factors associated with breast papillary lesions on core biopsy: a Canadian experience. Int J Surg Pathol. 2023;31(7):1206–1216. doi:10.1177/10668969221137515.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e296. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.

Park J, Lee NR, Oh HK, et al. Factors associated with upgrade, malignant upgrade, and subsequent breast cancer occurrence of papillary breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023;19(2):e96–e105. doi:10.1111/ajco.13798.

WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Breast tumours. 5th ed. Vol. 2. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019.

Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21:2409–2419. doi:10.1002/sim.1047.

Jakate K, De Brot M, Goldberg F, Muradali D, O’Malley FP, Mulligan AM. Papillary lesions of the breast: impact of breast pathology subspecialization on core biopsy and excision diagnoses. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(4):544–551. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e318243fa00.

Agoumi M, Giambattista J, Hayes MM. Practical considerations in breast papillary lesions: a review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(8):770–780. doi:10.5858/arpa.2015-0525-RA.

Shiino S, Tsuda H, Yoshida M, et al. Intraductal papillomas on core biopsy can be upgraded to malignancy on subsequent excisional biopsy regardless of the presence of atypical features. Pathol Int. 2015;65(6):293–300. doi:10.1111/pin.12285.

Authors

Maleeha Khan Lodhi
maleeha.k.lodhi@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Rufina Soomro
1.
Lodhi MK, Soomro R. Histopathological Upgrade in Papillary Breast Lesions Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Predictors and Clinical Implications from a Tertiary Care Cohort. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. [cited 2026 Aug. 31];13(4). Available from: https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/1372

Article Details