Evaluation of Breast Thermography Images according to Ultrasound Reports and Temperature Pattern Evaluation of Breast Thermography Images
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancers among women and researchers have been trying to examine it by various methods for several years. Different imaging methods have different precisions and accuracies, so choosing an appropriate imaging method, particularly for women with dense breast tissue, is very important. Since vascular structure and consequently regional temperature are different between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues, thermography imaging is able to diagnose cancer earlier than other methods.
Methods: In this research, vascular pattern and symmetry is checked in thermography images. Also, a special protocol has been derived from up-to-date ones, and it has been tested on 113 objects which were classified into normal and abnormal groups. Ultrasound reports are used for evaluation. Since some of the ultrasound images were suspicious, the biopsy reports were used as more accurate criteria for assessment.
Results: The results of this study have an acceptable accuracy and sensitivity which are 86% and 82%, respectively.
Conclusion: Final evaluations in this study show that thermography is not only an inexpensive, painless and radiation-free imaging technique that is appropriate for all ages, but also, if it is conducted according to the mentioned protocol, it will yield good results.
Full text article
References
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763.
Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Recinella AN, Kandlikar SG, Dabydeen D, Medeiros L, Phatak P. Technology, application and potential of dynamic breast thermography for the detection of breast cancer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2019 Mar 1;131:558-73. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.089.
Jasti VD, Zamani AS, Arumugam K, Naved M, Pallathadka H, Sammy F, et al. Computational technique based on machine learning and image processing for medical image analysis of breast cancer diagnosis. Security and communication networks. 2022;2022(1):1918379. doi:10.1155/2022/1918379.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016;66(1):7-30. doi:10.3322/caac.21332.
Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2022 Nov;72(6):524-41. doi:10.3322/caac.21754.
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2018. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2018.html. Accessed 2018 Mar 2.
Hakim A, Awale RN. Detection of breast pathology using thermography as a screening tool. In15th Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Conference 2020. doi:10.21611/qirt.2020.116.
Boquete L, Ortega S, Miguel-Jiménez JM, Rodríguez-Ascariz JM, Blanco R. Automated detection of breast cancer in thermal infrared images, based on independent component analysis. Journal of medical systems. 2012 Feb;36:103-11. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9450-y.
Aristokli N, Polycarpou I, Themistocleous SC, Sophocleous D, Mamais I. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient's history: A review. Radiography. 2022 Aug 1;28(3):848-56. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2022.01.006.
Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. Jama. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi:10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.
S Badiger, J Moger. A comparative study of mammography, sonography and infrared thermography in detection of cancer in breast. Int Surg J. 2020;7(6):1886-1892. doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20202401.
Al Husaini MA, Habaebi MH, Hameed SA, Islam MR, Gunawan TS. A systematic review of breast cancer detection using thermography and neural networks. IEEE Access. 2020 Nov 17;8:208922-37. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038817.
Kandlikar SG, Perez-Raya I, Raghupathi PA, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Dabydeen D, Medeiros L, et al. Infrared imaging technology for breast cancer detection–Current status, protocols and new directions. International Journal of heat and mass transfer. 2017 May 1;108:2303-20. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.01.086.
Surendiran B, Vadivel A. Mammogram mass classification using various geometric shape and margin features for early detection of breast cancer. International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics. 2012 Jan 1;4(1):36-54. doi:10.1504/IJMEI.2012.045302.
Ozao-Choy J, Giuliano AE. Breast cancer. In: Berek JS, editor. Berek and Novak's gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. chapter 40.
Hymczak H, Gołąb A, Mendrala K, Plicner D, Darocha T, Podsiadło P, et al. Core temperature measurement—principles of correct measurement, problems, and complications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 Oct 10;18(20):10606. doi:10.3390/ijerph182010606.
Zavvar T, Al Ridhawi I, Abbas A. Thermography-Based Early-Stage Breast Cancer Detection Using SVM. In2023 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications (IDSTA) 2023 Oct 24 (pp. 27-34). IEEE. doi:10.1109/IDSTA58916.2023.10317862.
Hankare P, Shah K, Nair D, Nair D. Breast cancer detection using thermography. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2016 Apr;4(3):2395-56.
Mohamed NA. Breast cancer risk detection using digital infrared thermal images. Int J Bioinform Biomed Eng. 2015;1(2):185-194.
Venkatachalam N, Shanmugam L, Heltin GC, Govindarajan G, Sasipriya P. Enhanced segmentation of inflamed ROI to improve the accuracy of identifying benign and malignant cases in breast thermogram. J Oncol. 2021;2021,(1):5566853. doi:10.1155/2021/5566853.
Aghdam NS, Amin MM, Tavakol ME, Ng EY. Designing and comparing different color map algorithms for pseudo-coloring breast thermograms. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics. 2013 Dec 1;3(4):487-93. doi:10.1166/jmihi.2013.1191.
Krüger K, Stefansson IM, Collett K, Arnes JB, Aas T, Akslen LA. Microvessel proliferation by co-expression of endothelial nestin and Ki-67 is associated with a basal-like phenotype and aggressive features in breast cancer. The Breast. 2013 Jun 1;22(3):282-8. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.07.008.
Hatwar R, Herman C. Inverse method for quantitative characterisation of breast tumours from surface temperature data. International Journal of Hyperthermia. 2017 Oct 3;33(7):741-57. doi:10.1080/02656736.2017.1306758.
Nicklaus KM, Cheong AL, Liu J, Reece GP, Bordes MC, Hanson SE, et al. Abstract P5-16-15: 3D symmetry of pre-operative breasts in cancer patients. Cancer Research. 2019 Feb 15;79(4_Supplement):P5-16. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS18-P5-16-15.
Dey A, Ali E, Rajan S. Bilateral symmetry-based abnormality detection in breast thermograms using textural features of hot regions. IEEE Open Journal of Instrumentation and Measurement. 2023 Aug 8;2:1-4. doi:10.1109/OJIM.2023.3302908.
Pesce K, Orruma MB, Hadad C, Bermúdez Cano Y, Secco R, Cernadas A. BI-RADS terminology for mammography reports: what residents need to know. RadioGraphics. 2019 Mar;39(2):319-20. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019180068.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Archives of Breast Cancer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright©. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.