The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Treatment:  A Systematic Review: Breast cancer treatment during pandemic

Michael Budiarta; Meagan Brennan

doi:10.32768/abc.202294421-438

Michael Budiarta ⁽¹⁾, Meagan Brennan ⁽²⁾

(1) School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia, Australia,

(2) School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia, Australia

https://doi.org/10.32768/abc.202294421-438

Issue
Volume 9, Issue 4, November 2022

Submitted
June 13, 2022

Published
July 30, 2022

Keywords:

COVID-19, Breast cancer, surgery, Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, Pandemic, coronavirus.

PDF XML

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, health resources were stretched, access was impacted by lockdowns and there were concerns about exposure to the virus during visits to hospitals. The purpose of this study was to examine how breast cancer treatments (presentation, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy) changed or were adapted during the early phase of the pandemic.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidance. Eligible studies presented original data reporting changes to early breast cancer treatment by comparing ‘pandemic’ treatment to a ‘pre-pandemic’ cohort or to ‘ideal’ treatment of individual cases. Data were extracted into evidence tables and narrative synthesis was used to analyse results.

Results: Fifteen studies with paired design were eligible. These reported outcomes for 6,353 people treated for early breast cancer (January 2020–June 2021). All studies reported some change to treatment due to the pandemic. The nature of reported changes was inconsistent. Changes included: tumours more advanced at presentation compared to pre-pandemic, increase in breast conserving surgery; increase in simple mastectomy (without breast reconstruction); trend towards increased wait times, delays to start of treatment, shorter post-operative hospital stay and hypofractionation or omission of radiotherapy. Centres used more or less neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.

Conclusion: In the early stage of the pandemic, fewer early-stage breast cancer cases were treated many centres. Treatment for breast cancer was impacted and various local solutions were developed. These included less complicated breast surgery, increased use of neoadjuvant therapy, and changes to radiotherapy regimens. Surgery was frequently delayed and breast reconstruction was often unavailable. These results have implications for breast cancer services during the pandemic recovery as a ‘catch-up’ increase in cancer diagnoses is expected. Women may wish to access breast reconstruction, unavailable due to COVID-19. The impact of changes to treatment on long-term quality of life should be evaluated.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Worobey M. Dissecting the early COVID-19 cases in Wuhan. Science. 2021;374(6572):1202-4. doi: 10.1126/science.abm4454.

World Health Organisation. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.

World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 - 22 June 2022 2022 [Edition 97:[Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---22-june-2022.

World Health Organization. Breast cancer 2021 [updated 26 March 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.

Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M, Purushotham A, Nolte E, Sullivan R, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. The Lancet Oncology. 2020;21(8):1023-34. doi: doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30388-0.

Hui JYC, Yuan J, Teoh D, Thomaier L, Jewett P, Beckwith H, et al. Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Results From a National Physician Cross-sectional Survey. American journal of clinical oncology. 2020;43(10):679-84. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000757.

PROSPERO. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: National Institute for Health Research; 2022 [Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch VA, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2021. doi: Not Available

Acea-Nebril B, García-Novoa A, García-Jiménez L, Escribano-Posada C, Díaz-Carballada C, Bouzón-Alejandro A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a breast cancer surgery program. Observational case-control study in a COVID-free hospital. Breast J. 2020;26(12):2428-30. doi: 10.1111/tbj.14037.

Cadili L, DeGirolamo K, McKevitt E, Brown CJ, Prabhakar C, Pao JS, et al. COVID-19 and breast cancer at a Regional Breast Centre: our flexible approach during the pandemic. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;186(2):519-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06008-3.

Dave RV, Kim B, Courtney A, O'Connell R, Rattay T, Taxiarchi VP, et al. Breast cancer management pathways during the COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes from the UK 'Alert Level 4' phase of the B-MaP-C study. British Journal of Cancer. 2021;124(11):1785-94. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01234-4.

Eijkelboom AH, de Munck L, Vrancken Peeters M, Broeders MJM, Strobbe LJA, Bos M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosis, stage, and initial treatment of breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01073-7.

Fancellu A, Sanna V, Piredda C, Ariu L, Piana GQ, Deiana G, et al. The COVID-19 outbreak may be associated to a reduced level of care for breast cancer. A comparative study with the pre-COVID era in an Italian Breast Unit...12th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-12), October 2-3, 2020 (Virtual Conference). European Journal of Cancer. 2020;138:S16-S7. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(20)30562-1.

Hawrot K, Shulman LN, Bleiweiss IJ, Wilkie EJ, Frosch ZAK, Jankowitz RC, et al. Time to Treatment Initiation for Breast Cancer During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021:Op2000807. doi: 10.1200/op.20.00807.

Kennard K, Williams AD, Goldblatt LG, Buckley ME, Bruce L, Larson S, et al. COVID-19 Pandemic: Changes in Care for a Community Academic Breast Center and Patient Perception of Those Changes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021:1-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09583-3.

Koch CA, Lee G, Liu ZA, Liu FF, Fyles A, Han K, et al. Rapid Adaptation of Breast Radiation Therapy Use During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic at a Large Academic Cancer Center in Canada. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;5(4):749-56. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.002.

Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Park CS, Park HY. Patterns of Delaying Surgery for Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Daegu, South Korea. Front Surg. 2020;7:576196. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.576196.

Montagna E, Bellerba F, Sangalli C, Gandini S, Cancello G, Aliaga PT, et al. Management of breast cancer patients during the peak of the COVID 19 pandemic. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.037.

Ngaserin S, Chua HW, Chew MH, Tan BK. A tripartite approach can seek to optimize breast cancer management during a pandemic - Real-Time experience of a developing breast oncology unit in Singapore. Breast J. 2020;26(8):1593-6. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13961.

Romics L, Doughty J, Stallard S, Mansell J, Blackhall V, Lannigan A, et al. A prospective cohort study of the safety of breast cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic in the West of Scotland. Breast. 2021;55:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.015.

Satish T, Raghunathan R, Prigoff JG, Wright JD, Hillyer GA, Trivedi MS, et al. Care Delivery Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Care. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021:Op2001062. doi: 10.1200/op.20.01062.

Vanni G, Pellicciaro M, Materazzo M, Pedini D, Portarena I, Buonomo C, et al. Advanced Stages and Increased Need for Adjuvant Treatments in Breast Cancer Patients: The Effect of the One-year COVID-19 Pandemic. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(5):2689-96. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15050.

Vanni G, Tazzioli G, Pellicciaro M, Materazzo M, Paolo O, Cattadori F, et al. Delay in Breast Cancer Treatments During the First COVID-19 Lockdown. A Multicentric Analysis of 432 Patients. Anticancer Res. 2020;40(12):7119-25. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14741.

Zhang EJ, Stuart K, Hui R, Mellor R, Wang W, Ahern V, et al. Management of Early Breast Cancer at an Australian Cancer Centre During the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic. Available at: SSRN 3829713. 2021.

Authors

Michael Budiarta

School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia

Meagan Brennan

School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-7643

meagan.brennan@sydney.edu.au (Primary Contact)

Author Biography

Michael Budiarta, School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia

MD student, University of Notre Dame Australia

Budiarta M, Brennan M. The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review: Breast cancer treatment during pandemic. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 26];9(4):421-38. Available from: https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/601

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright©. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Kathy Flitcroft, Meagan Brennan, Andrew Spillane, Health System Barriers to the Discussion of Breast Reconstruction Options in Australia: Improving Access Through Appropriate Referral , Archives of Breast Cancer: Vol 7, No 4: November 2020
Meagan Brennan, Brooke Nickel, Nehmat Houssami, The Challenge of Breast Density– Options for Management and Breast Cancer Screening , Archives of Breast Cancer: Vol 7, No 4: November 2020
Elissa J Zhang, Kirsty Stuart, Rina Hui, Rhiannon Mellor, Wei Wang, Verity Ahern, Farid Meybodi, James French, Elisabeth Elder, Meagan Brennan, Management of Early Breast Cancer at an Australian Cancer Centre During the Early Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic , Archives of Breast Cancer: Vol 8, No 4: November 2021

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 has had a huge impact worldwide. The first COVID-19 infection was reported in Wuhan,

China in December 2019 1 , and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic in March 2020. 2 By mid-2022, over 536 million confirmed cases and more than 6.3 million deaths were reported globally. 3 This has had a huge impact on the management of resources towards the care of COVID-19 patients. In addition to this, government enactments of stay-at-home orders had a direct effect on the care of chronic disease and cancer patients.

Review Article Open Access

Before the pandemic, nearly two and a half million women around the world were diagnosed with breast cancer each year. 4 The pandemic has potentially had an effect on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment for these millions of women due to changes in healthseeking behavior and reduced availability of screening and treatment services. 5 Understanding the changes that occurred due to the pandemic is essential as women may be at risk of poor cancer outcomes due to suboptimal treatment. 6 Reviewing the experience in cancer treatment centers may also assist in planning for future variants, pandemics or other major disruptions to health care. This study has systematically reviewed the published literature and explored changes to breast cancer treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) during the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing 'pandemic' treatment to 'pre-pandemic' or 'ideal' treatment.

This review was registered on PROSPERO (Study ID CRD42021279655) 7 and it was performed using PRISMA methodology. 8

METHODS

Eligibility criteria

Studies were eligible if they reported the management of breast cancer during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (January 2020-June 2021) and used a paired design, which included a comparison group (either a non-COVID time period or an individual patient comparison to 'usual' or 'ideal' treatment that would have been delivered during a non-COVID period). Studies reporting surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or primary endocrine therapy were eligible. A change to treatment was defined as a delay, replacement of one treatment with another, change in the sequencing of treatment modalities or omission of one or more standard treatment options.

Additional eligibility criteria were: original studies, published in full in English in the peerreviewed literature. Exclusion criteria were abstractonly publications, letters, review articles and studies reporting treatment during the pandemic that did not include a comparison group.

A search of EBSCO (including CINAHL, MEDLINE and Psych INFO), PubMed and Cochrane Library was performed using the search terms:

("Breast Cancer" OR "Breast neoplasm") AND (Surgery OR Chemotherapy OR Radiotherapy OR Treatment OR Management) AND (Pandemic OR COVID OR "COVID-19" OR coronavirus OR "SARS COV-2")

Selection process

Following removal of duplicates, titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by both authors.

Full-text papers were retrieved and re-screened by both authors.

Data were extracted by one author (MSB) and checked by the other (MEB). Data were collected on study characteristics (study setting, design, population, comparison group, number of participants), COVID setting (country, associated COVID protocols/ health order, COVID prevalence in study group) and cancer treatment outcomes (presentation, change or delay to treatment types). Data were extracted into a spreadsheet. Data were analyzed by grouping studies according to outcomes of interest and treatment type and comparing the results. Results were presented in narrative form.

Risk of bias assessment

The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies was used to assess the risk of bias. It measures the quality of nonrandomized studies based on three criteria: selection of the study groups; comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest. It produces a score for each criterion with a total maximum score of 7. 9 Risk of bias was independently assessed by each author and consensus was reached after discussing discordant results.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 485 abstracts. After screening, 15 full-text studies met our eligibility criteria 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (Figure 1: PRISMA flowchart). These studies reported outcomes for 6,353 people treated for early breast cancer from January 2020 to June 2021.

Study characteristics

Study characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were eight studies from Europe, 10 12 13 14 19 21 23 24 five from North America, 11 15 16 17 22 and two from Asia. 18 20 Eleven studies compared treatment during the COVID period to a similar non-COVID period. 10 11 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 23 24 There were four, 12 16 18 21 prospective and 11 retrospective studies. 10 11 13 14 15 17 19 20 22 23 24 Four compared the actual treatment of individual patients during the COVID to the 'usual' or 'ideal' treatment that would usually have been delivered in a non-COVID period. 12 16 18 22 For treatment modalities, 14 studies included data for surgery 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 , ten for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 10 12 13 14 15 16 18 21 23 24 four for adjuvant chemotherapy, 12 18 22 24 nine for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, 10 12 13 15 16 18 21 22 24 seven for adjuvant radiation therapy, 10 12 15 17 18 22 24 and four studies included data on a 'no treatment' group. 12 13 16 18 The studies were all conducted in settings that were negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, 10 studies were under lockdown conditions, which included stay-at-home orders. 10 12 14 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 Five studies were conducted at times when services were affected by challenges to the hospital or health system due to COVID-19 infection in the community. 11 13 15 19 20 Risk of bias Assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies 9 indicated a very low risk of bias across the studies (Table 1). Thirteen studies received the maximum scores of 4, 2, and 1 for the three individual components (total score of 7, indicating low risk of bias). 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 Two studies received scores of 4, 1 and 1 (total score of 6). 20 21 Both studies scoring 6 lost a point under the Outcome/Exposure domain due to not reporting follow-up data on the cohort. This was not considered to be a significant bias for this review, which is focused on initial treatment of breast cancer rather than longer-term outcomes. Table 2 shows the characteristics of cancer presentations. Six studies reported a significant decrease in the number of cases treated during COVID-19 period. 10 13 15 17 20 23 The difference ranged from a 19-33% decrease in cases compared to non-COVID-19 period. 13 15 Three studies reported an increase in the number of cases: one reported a non-significant increase, 11 and two others reported a 7% and 18% increase. 19 24 One of these studies attributed the increase to receiving cancer patients from designated COVID hospitals in the region, 19 while the other study attributed the increase to the exclusion of nononcological breast surgery cases (mostly breast reconstruction), which were more common in the pre-COVID control group. 24 The remaining 5 studies did not report on the difference in the number of cases during COVID-19 period. 12 16 18 21 22 *likely overlap in patient populations in the two Vanni studies; **Quality/risk of bias score Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment for Cohort Studies nr=not reported; na=not applicable; BCS=breast conservation surgery; BR=breast reconstruction; ET=endocrine therapy; WLE=wide local excision; SLNB=sentinel lymph node biopsy; ALND=axillary lymph node dissection; *likely overlap in patient populations in the two Vanni studies

Number of Breast Cancer Cases during COVID-19 Period

Patient and tumour characteristics

Most studies reported no difference in the age of the cohort during the COVID period (Table 2). 10 11 14 15 20 23 24 Two studies reported a younger COVID cohort compared to non-COVID cohort and. 12 17 Two studies reported that older patients are more likely to delay surgery or have a change to their treatment. 18 22 Six studies reported a higher proportion of invasive cancers (compared to DCIS cases) and a higher proportion of more advanced tumour stage in the COVID cohort. 15 19 20 21 23 24 Three studies reported that the group with higher tumour stage were less likely to experience delays of changes to their treatment. 16 18 22 Two studies reported no difference in tumour characteristics between the COVID and control group. 13 14 Changes to treatment modalities Surgery Changes to surgical treatment are shown in Table 3. Several aspects of surgical treatment were changed during the COVID-19 period. For surgical procedure, six studies reported no difference to the type of breast surgery during the COVID-19 period. 10 11 13 16 20 24 This included comparisons between breast conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy, breast reconstruction (BR). Three studies reported an increase in cases and proportion of surgical cases undergoing BCS. 18 21 23 The same studies also reported a decrease in mastectomy with BR. One study reported a decrease in the proportion of BCS and BR with an increase in simple mastectomy (without reconstruction). 14 One study reported a decrease in prophylactic surgery and increase in nipple-sparing mastectomy. 19 Some of the studies also reported data on axillary surgery during the COVID-19 period. These include data on axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Four studies reported an increase in ALND proportion, along with a decrease in SLNB. Three studies reported no differences in the proportion or number of ALND and SLNB procedures.

Most of the studies reported whether changes to waiting time for surgery/treatment occurred. Five studies reported no difference in the wait time during the COVID-19 period. 10 11 14 15 20 Six studies reported an increased wait time during the COVID-19 period. 12 13 16 18 21 22 24 The additional wait time for surgery (delay) ranged from 8 to 47 days. No study reported a shorter wait time for treatment during the COVID-19 period. One study grouped surgical delay into cases that were directly related to service issues, where delay was unavoidable, and cases where patients elected to delay their surgery to avoid exposure to the virus and/or additional stress on the system. 18 It is unclear in the remaining studies how much of the reported delay may have been due to 'system' issues versus patient choice.

Five studies reported a shorter hospital stay after surgery. 10 11 14 19 24 Some studies showed an increase in proportion of same day discharges, 11 19 others show a 0.7 to 1-day decrease in hospital stay during the COVID-19 period. 10 14 One study reported no difference in hospital stay duration. 24 Some of the studies also noted additional data relating to changes in surgery during the COVID-19 period. One study reported an increase in regional anaesthesia (relative to general anaesthesia), and another study reported a decrease in the use of regional anaesthesia. One study reported an increase in telehealth usage for surgical follow-up during the COVID-19 period. Two studies reported no difference in re-operation rate, readmission and surgical complications.

Chemotherapy Three studies reported no change in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) during the COVID-19 period. Three studies reported a decrease in the use of NACT; one specified the decrease was in Stage I and II patients. Another study noted the substitution of NACT with endocrine therapy instead. Two studies reported an increase in the use of NACT during the COVID-19 period.

Three studies reported using primary systemic therapy (PST, data for NACT and NAET reported together). One had an increase in its use, 22 and two others reported no changes. 10 16 Three studies reported a decrease in or omission of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), while one reported no significant difference in CT cases during the COVID-19 period.

Radiotherapy Six studies reported data for radiotherapy. 12 15 17 18 22 23 In one study, fewer women commenced treatment in the study period, 17 and in another there was an increase (in a study that had more BCS cases during the pandemic). 23 Another study reported changes to treatment regimens, with an increase in recommendations for omission or hypofractionation (15 fractions reduced to five). 12 Endocrine therapy Studies reported increased use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Four studies reported increased use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) 12 13 15 16 . These include a general increase in the use of NAET to postpone non-urgent surgery and as a replacement for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. One study reported no significant difference in the use of NAET during the COVID-19 period, 23 and the remaining studies did not report outcomes for NAET.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer treatment. Fifteen studies with a paired design were identified and these were all of high quality (low risk of bias) despite the challenges of conducting research during the pandemic.

The extent of the impact of the pandemic varied across studies. Most studies reported stable numbers or fewer cases of breast cancer presenting for treatment during the pandemic. A decrease is unsurprising given the lockdowns and restrictions in access to health care, including screening and diagnostic services. However, many studies reported an increase in the proportion of later stage cancers, suggesting that the 'missing' cancers (predicted but not diagnosed) are likely to be early cancers that would have been detected by screening during this period. One hypothesis could be that mortality from breast cancer will not be impacted by the pandemic if these early-stage cancers are identified in the early months of COVID recovery (while delayed but still early-stage). The increase in case numbers was seen in one study appeared to be due to restructuring of local health services for dedicated COVID-19 treatment hospitals rather than a true increase in case numbers in the health jurisdiction. 19 Therefore, the numbers in individual hospitals may not always reflect the total number of cases in a health district or state/province and population-level data is required to examine the true incidence of breast cancer during 2020 and 2021.

There was a general trend towards increased wait time for treatment or increased delays during the COVID-19 pandemic. 12 13 16 18 21 22 24 There was also a trend towards reduced hospital stay duration and increased number of same-day discharges. 10 11 14 19 This is likely to represent an aim to minimise the amount of time that patients were in hospital to reduce the risk of cancer patients contracting COVID-19 and to minimise the burden of non-COVID cases in the hospital. Services demonstrated an ability to adapt to the local conditions by performing more breast conservation surgery or using more neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in response to the challenges of admitting patients to hospital for surgery. In some studies, delay to surgical treatment was intentional and even chosen by patients in consultation with their doctors. In one study, women who were older, with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer were more likely to take up the option of delayed surgery combined with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. 12 Most of the studies reviewed in this paper reported on surgical therapy. Other treatment modalities were less frequently reported. While most studies reported no change in the type of surgical procedure performed, some reported an increase in breast conserving surgery (including a study that reported an increase in oncoplastic procedures). 21 The explanation for this is unclear. It may reflect an attempt to conserve the breast in women who may have otherwise undergone mastectomy, to minimise hospital stay and avoid breast reconstruction surgery, which was suspended by many centres during the pandemic. The increase in the proportion of breast conservation procedures may also be related to the fact that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used to delay surgery in some cases, resulting in tumour shrinkage. However, the increase in breast conservation could be expected to result in an increasing proportion of women requiring breast radiotherapy. Only six studies discussed the impact of COVID on breast radiotherapy and these generally indicated a trend towards hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation protocols rather than an increase in radiotherapy case numbers overall. An increase in axillary lymph node dissection with a decrease in sentinel lymph node biopsy was observed in some studies. 10 21 23 24 This may imply more advanced stage of cancer in surgical patients, and it is difficult to reconcile with the increase in breast conservation.

It was rare for centres to continue performing breast reconstruction during the pandemic. 19 While some patients with more extensive in-breast disease may have been treated with extended oncoplastic conservation procedures, 20 others may have been forced to accept simple mastectomy without reconstruction. 16 18 24 This is consistent with other cohort studies during the pandemic that indicated breast reconstruction was unavailable in many places. 10 12 14 18 25 Lack of access to immediate breast reconstruction may be one of the long-term negative quality-of-life impacts of cancer during the pandemic. Long-term follow-up of these cases is needed to investigate the number of women who access delayed reconstruction procedures and the impact of waiting for reconstruction or not having the option at all.

This study has some limitations. The included studies are heterogenous in the method they used to report changes in treatment due to COVID-19, so pooling the results was not possible. Publication bias was not assessed, and this may have had an impact on the studies that were available for inclusion.

CONCLUSION

The 15 studies included in this review demonstrated a significant impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer treatment. The changes to treatment were not consistent across the studies. This reflects the individual solutions that cancer centres found, and these were determined by their local circumstances. Delaying surgery by using more neoadjuvant therapy was seen in six of the 15 studies. 12 15 18 20 21 23 A preference for simpler surgical procedures (breast conservation or simple mastectomy) was seen and most centres were unable to provide immediate breast reconstruction. A higher proportion of later-stage cancers was seen, suggesting that more serious cancers presented for treatment and that early screendetected cancers were not identified during this period. Ongoing observation of the cohort of women treated during the pandemic, and correlation with population-level incidence and survival data is essential to fully understand the long-term impact of COVID-19 on breast cancer. Lack of access to breast reconstruction may have a lasting negative effect on quality of life and this should also be explored with follow-up studies.

PRISMA Flowchart

Read Counter : 848 Download : 53

Share Now

The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review Breast cancer treatment during pandemic

Abstract

Full text article

References

Authors

Michael Budiarta, School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

Important Links

Contact Info

Article Sidebar

Abstract

Full text article

References

Authors

Michael Budiarta, School of Medicine Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Oxford St, Darlinghurst, NSW Australia

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

Important Links

Contact Info