Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on the Expression of Genes Encoding the Enzymes Involved in Steroidogenesis in Normal Breast Epithelium and Abdominal Adipose Tissue of Women with Excessive Adiposity: Dietary energy restriction and steroidogenesis in normal breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue

Danila Coradini

doi:10.32768/abc.202294480-487

Danila Coradini ⁽¹⁾

(1) Laboratory of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Campus Cascina Rosa, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, Italy

https://doi.org/10.32768/abc.202294480-487

Issue
Volume 9, Issue 4, November 2022

Submitted
May 14, 2022

Published
July 19, 2022

Keywords:

dietary energy restriction, steroidogenesis, gene expression, breast epithelium, abdominal adipose tissue

PDF XML

Abstract

Background: Weight gain and excessive adiposity are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal women with a high circulating level of testosterone. In this in silico study, the effect of the dietary energy restriction (DER) on the expression of a panel of genes coding for the main enzymes involved in androgens and estrogens production was investigated in breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue of healthy women with excessive adiposity and randomly allocated to DER for one menstrual cycle or asked to continue their usual diet.

Methods: Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank test was used to assess the difference between paired samples before and after DER in the breast epithelium or adipose tissue, and Spearman’s rank correlation was used to investigate the correlation between genes.

Results: In response to DER, the expression of HSD17B12, the gene encoding the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of inactive estrone into bioactive estradiol, was significantly (P=0.0059) downregulated in breast epithelium and adipose tissue. Furthermore, the expression of HSD17B12 negatively correlated with that of the LRP1 gene (r= -0.91, P<0.0001), which codes for a multitasking protein recently proposed as a tumor suppressor in breast epithelium.

Conclusion: Present results showed that, in addition to the recognized systemic effects (reduction of the fatty mass and decrease of circulating biomarkers of breast cancer risk), DER could act locally by down-regulating the expression of some genes pivotally involved in the production of biologically active estrogens, thus contributing to prevent the estrogen-dependent initiation of breast cancer.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA. 2006;296(2):193-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.2.193.

Engin A. Obesity-associated breast cancer: analysis of risk factors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;960:571-606. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48382-5_25.

Vrieling A, Buck K, Kaaks R, Chang-Claude J. Adult weight gain in relation to breast cancer risk by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):641-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1116-4.

Harvie M, Howell A, Vierkant RA, Kumar N, Cerhan JR, Kelemen LE, et al. Association of gain and loss of weight before and after menopause with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the Iowa women’s health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3): 656-61. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0001.

Teras LR, Goodman M, Patel AV, Diver WR, Flanders WD, Feigelson HS. Weight loss and postmenopausal breast cancer in a prospective cohort of overweight and obese US women. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(4):573-9. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9730-y.

Prentice RL, Caan B, Chlebowski RT, Patterson R, Kuller LH, Ockene JK, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of invasive breast cancer: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA. 2006;295(6);629-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.6.629.

Dirx MJ, Zeegers MP, Dagnelie PC, van den Bogaard T, van den Brandt PA. Energy restriction and the risk of spontaneous mammary tumors in mice: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2003;106(5):766-70. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11277.

Howell A, Chapman M, Harvie M. Energy restriction for breast cancer prevention. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2008;181:97-111. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69297-3_11.

Harvie M, Howell A. Energy balance adiposity and breast cancer—energy restriction strategies for breast cancer prevention. Obes Rev. 2006;7(1):33-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00207.x.

Pisani P. Hyper-insulinaemia and cancer, meta-analyses of epidemiological studies. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2008;114(1):63-70. doi: 10.1080/13813450801954451.

Ong KR, Sims AH, Harvie M, Chapman M, Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Goodacre R, Wilson M, Thomas N, Clarke RB, Howell A. Biomarkers of dietary energy restriction in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res. 2009;2(8):720-31. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0008.

Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(4):343-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00314-0.

Laplante Y, Rancourt C, Poirier D. Relative involvement of three 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (types 1, 7 and 12) in the formation of estradiol in various breast cancer cell lines using selective inhibitors. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;301(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.026.

Suzuki T, Miki Y, Nakamura Y, Moriya T, Ito K, Ohuchi N, et al. Sex steroid-producing enzymes in human breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2005;12(4):701-20. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.00834.

Aka JA, Mazumdar M, Lin SX. Reductive 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in the sulfatase pathway: critical in the cell proliferation of breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;301(1-2):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.10.042.

Wu L, Einstein M, Geissler WM, Chan HK, Elliston KO, Andersson S. Expression cloning and characterization of human 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2, a microsomal enzyme possessing 20 α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(17):12964-9. doi: Not Available

Emonard H, Théret L, Bennasroune AH, Dedieu S. Regulation of LRP-1 expression: make the point. Pathol Biol. 2014;62(2):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.02.002.

Okada SS, Grobmyer SR, Barnathan ES. Contrasting effects of plasminogen activators, urokinase receptor, and LDL receptor-related protein on smooth muscle cell migration and invasion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(10):1269-76. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.16.10.1269.

van der Geer P. Phosphorylation of LRP1: regulation of transport and signal transduction. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002;12(4):160-5. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(02)00154-8.

Kinoshita A, Shah T, Tangredi MM, Strickland DK, Hyman BT. The intracellular domain of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein modulates transactivation mediated by amyloid precursor protein and Fe65. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(42):41182-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306403200.

Lillis AP, Mikhailenko I, Strickland DK. Beyond endocytosis: LRP function in cell migration, proliferation and vascular permeability. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(8):1884-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01371.x.

Suzuki T, Darnel A, Akahira JI, Ariga N, Ogawa S, Kaneko C, et al. 5alpha-reductases in human breast carcinoma: possible modulator of in situ androgenic actions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(5):2250-7. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7444.

Authors

Danila Coradini

Laboratory of Medical Statistics and Biometry, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Campus Cascina Rosa, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-4341

danila.coradini@gmail.com (Primary Contact)

Coradini D. Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on the Expression of Genes Encoding the Enzymes Involved in Steroidogenesis in Normal Breast Epithelium and Abdominal Adipose Tissue of Women with Excessive Adiposity: Dietary energy restriction and steroidogenesis in normal breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue. Arch Breast Cancer [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 19 [cited 2024 Oct. 30];9(4):480-7. Available from: https://archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/592

Download Citation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright©. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Danila Coradini, Federico Ambrogi, Gabriele Infante, Cholesterol de novo Biosynthesis in Paired Samples of Breast Cancer and Adjacent Histologically Normal Tissue: Association with Proliferation Index, Tumor Grade, and Recurrence-Free Survival , Archives of Breast Cancer: Volume 10, Issue 2, May 2023
Danila Coradini, Mammographic Density and Expression of the Genes Involved in the de novo Cholesterol Biosynthesis , Archives of Breast Cancer: Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): Volume 11, Number 3, August 2024

INTRODUCTION

Growing evidence indicates that weight gain and excessive adiposity are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal women. 1 2 Besides, it suggests that the changes occurring in the hormonal milieu of postmenopausal women may play a crucial role in promoting and sustaining neoplastic transformation. Indeed, after ovarian activity diminishes, the predominant biological mechanism associated with the risk of developing breast cancer is the elevated production estrogens by androgens aromatization in the adipose tissue, 3 which increases with the increase of the fatty mass. The bioactive estradiol can stimulate the breast epithelial cells that express estrogen receptors to synthesize growth factors that will act in a paracrine manner on the adjacent estrogen-negative epithelial cells, promoting their proliferation. Conversely, in premenopausal women with excessive adiposity, the cumulative effect of the physiological ovarian production of steroid hormones with the high level of estrogens produced in the adipose tissue will result in negative impacts on the hypothalamic-pituitary release of gonadotropins. This will lead to the subsequent reduction in ovarian steroid production, thus explaining the paradoxical protective role of fat accumulation against breast cancer development observed in young women. 4 Clinical evidence has demonstrated that the risk of breast cancer in postmenopause decreases with weight loss, especially with a weight loss before menopause. 5 6 Based on the evidence that dietary energy restriction (DER) significantly reduces spontaneous mammary tumors in animals, 7 some studies investigated the changes induced by DER on the recognized systemic factors associated with the risk of breast cancer in overweight or obese women, such as the circulating levels of estradiol, testosterone, insulin, leptin, lipoprotein particles, triglycerides, sex hormone-binding globulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Others investigated the effects of DER on the local expression of the genes involved in glycolysis and lipids synthesis. 7 8 9 10 However, no study has investigated the impact of DER on the genes coding for the enzymes involved in the production of androgens and estrogens. Using the publicly accessible dataset associated with the study on glycolysis and lipids synthesis, 10 I investigated the effects of DER on the expression of these genes in a group of women with excessive adiposity and randomly assigned to DER for one menstrual cycle or asked to continue their usual diet.

METHODS

Gene expression dataset (identified by the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number GSE66159) and the associated clinical information were retrieved from the NCBI GEO database (HTTPS://www.ncbi.nlm.nhi.gov/geo/). As reported in the original article, 10 the case series consisted of 19 premenopausal overweight or obese (BMI between 28 and 40kg/m 2 ) women, aged between 35 and 45 years, randomly assigned to DER [liquid diet, which provided about 60% of the daily energy intake, 3,656kJ/d (864kcal/d); n=10] or asked to continue the usual diet (n=9) for one menstrual cycle. Briefly, core biopsies were obtained from breast tissue or abdominal fat before and after DER: the first biopsies were taken from either the left or right breast/abdominal side chosen by computer randomization, whereas the repeat biopsies were taken on the opposite side to avoid the gene expression changes due to the healing process. RNA was extracted from abdominal adipose tissue and breast epithelium (isolated from whole breast tissue by laser capture microdissection) and hybridized to Affymetrix HGU133 Plus2 GeneChips (GEO accession GPL570). After microarray running, raw data were processed and log 2 -transformed. The Bolton (Lancashire) Local Research Ethics Committee approved the original study, and all participants signed written informed consent before participation. Further details on patients' selection criteria, sampling procedure and expression data processing (raw data filtration and normalization) are available in the original article. 10 Gene set selection According to the aim of the study, a group of 18 genes known as pivotally involved in the classical and alternative steroidogenic pathways (AKR1C3, CYP11A1, CYP17A1, CYP19A1, HSD3B2, HSD17B1, HSD17B2, HSD17B6, HSD17B7, HSD17B12, SRD5A1, SRD5A2, STS, and SULT1A1, Figure 1) or coding for lipoprotein receptors (LDLR, LPR1, SCARB1, and VLDLR) was selected.

Statistical analysis

The Wilcoxon-Signed-Rank test was used to assess the differential gene expression in the subgroup of women undergoing DER compared to those who continued their usual diet and the difference between paired samples before and after DER in the breast or adipose tissue. Spearman's rank correlation rho was used to investigate the correlation between the genes. Because of the exploratory aim of the analysis, according to Bender and Lange, 12 no multiple-testing corrections were adopted, and only a P-value<0.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At baseline, in both breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue, no gene was differentially expressed in the subgroup of women undergoing DER compared to women that continued their usual diet.

Effect of DER on gene expression in breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue

Of the 18 genes selected for the study, only AKR1C3, HSD17B12, and VLDLR were found downregulated in response to DER in a statistically significant manner (P<0.01). In particular, HSD17B12 and VLDLR were downregulated in breast epithelium, whereas HSD17B12 and AKR1C3 were downregulated in abdominal adipose tissue ( Figure 2).

Effect of DER on the association of HSD17B12 or VLDLR with the other genes of the group in breast epithelium

Correlation analysis (Table 1) showed that the substantial reduction in the expression level of HSD17B12 or VLDLR following DER was associated with some changes in the association with the other genes included in the group. The most remarkable of these changes were: the very high negative correlation between HSD17B12 and LRP1 (r=-0.91) or SRD5A2 (r=-0.74), the loss of the positive association of HSD17B12 with AKR1C3 or STS, the increase in the positive association of VLDLR with AKR1C3 (r=0.86) and the negative association of VLDLR with HSD17B7 (r=-0.67) (Figure 3).

Effect of DER on the association of AKR1C3 or HSD17B12 with the other genes of the group in abdominal adipose tissue

Correlation analysis (Table 1) showed that, following DER, the positive association between HSD17B12 and AKR1C3 or HSD17B1 disappeared, and the negative association of HSD17B12 with CYP17A1 or LRP1 decreased considerably (Figure 4).

DISCUSSION

Among the genes coding for the enzymes involved in the production of bioactive androgens and estrogens, only HSD17B12 was differentially expressed in breast epithelium and abdominal adipose tissue of women undergoing DER compared to women that continued their usual diet. This finding is important because the HSD17B12 gene encodes a member of the 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase family (17β-HSD12) that converts the estrone formed by the aromatization of androstenedione into the biologically active estradiol and is specifically expressed in breast tissue. 11 12 13 14 The fact that, after only one month, DER downregulated the expression of CYP19A1 and STS, although in a not statistically significant manner (Supplementary Figure 1), suggests that diet restriction may affect the local production of estradiol, thus reducing the proliferative stimulus on epithelial cells and consequently the risk of developing breast cancer. CYP19A1 and STS, in fact, code, respectively, for the aromatase that converts testosterone into estradiol and steroid sulfatase that converts back sulfate estradiol into the bioactive estradiol.

Noteworthy, the downregulation of HSD17B12 was associated with substantial changes in the relationship with some other genes included in the group. The most evident of these changes is the appearance of a very high negative correlation with LRP1 (r= -0.91, P<0.001), an unexpected finding considering that DER per se did not affect LRP1 expression.

LRP1 codes for the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LPR1). Also known as apolipoprotein E receptor, LRP1 is a member of the LDLR family broadly expressed in multiple cell types such as mesenchymal and epithelial cells.17 Initially identified as a transmembrane receptor for apoEenriched lipoprotein particles (especially chylomicron remnants), LRP1 is now known as implicated in several cellular processes, including cell growth and migration18 and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. 15 Moreover, in addition to the documented capability of controlling the pericellular levels of various growth factors and proteases, LRP1 modulates gene transcription through its intracellular domain that, once cleaved, can enter the nucleus where it regulates gene transcription and then is recycled into the cytoplasm.20 Because of this modulatory activity on gene transcription, LPR1 has been proposed as a tumor suppressor. 16 In agreement with this suppressive role, it is reasonable to hypothesize that LRP1 may block the production of bioactive estradiol, downregulating the expression of the HSD17B12 gene without a substantial increase of the expression level of the LPR1 gene but rather by increasing the recycling of the cleaved intracellular domain. Supplementary Figure 1. Expression of CYP19A1 and STS gene in breast epithelium before (Baseline), after DER (DER), or after usual diet (CTR). Following DER, LRP1 expression was associated positively with SRD5A2 (r=0.78, P=0.008), which, in turn, was associated negatively with HSD17B12. The finding is relevant because SRD5A2 encodes the 5α-reductase 2, the enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of androstenedione (the direct precursor of testosterone) into the less potent androgen androstenedione, following the so-called androgen alternative pathway.22 On the one hand, such a conversion reduces the amount of testosterone available to be converted directly into estradiol by aromatase and, on the other hand, the amount of androstenedione to be aromatized into estrone which will be, in turn, converted into estradiol by HSD17B12. These two effects will concur in reducing the estradiol production and the subsequent proliferative stimulus on epithelial cells.

Regarding the abdominal adipose tissue, the most remarkable finding is that, compared to breast epithelium, the substantial decrease in the expression level of HSD17B12 was not associated with a change in the correlation with LRP1 and SRD5A2. The negative association of HSD17B12 with LRP1 was weak and not statistically significant (r=-0.42, P=0.226), and the association with SRD5A2 disappeared. Conversely, a negative association between HSD17B12 and CYP19A1 (r=-0.60, P=0.065) was observed following DER, suggesting the cellular attempt to restore the local estradiol by increasing testosterone aromatization.

Undoubtedly, the small number of subjects who participated in the study, mainly caused by the invasiveness of the sampling procedure that required repeated biopsies in both breasts and the abdominal adipose tissue of healthy women, may represent a potential concern about the reliability of the results.

That was overcome, at least in part, by the homogeneity for weight, age, and parity of the subjects, 10 which resulted in an almost superimposable gene expression profile of baseline and repeat biopsies of the breast epithelium or abdominal adipose tissue in the control subgroup. Furthermore, the stringent criteria adopted in the statistical analysis allowed us to identify only the genes differentially expressed in response to DER.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that, in addition to the advantages described in the original article, 10 which include: a significant weight reduction (−7.0 ± 2.3 kg), a decreased level of some recognized circulating biomarkers associated with the risk of breast cancer such as leptin, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, and the changes in the expression of the genes involved in lipid metabolism and glycolytic pathways, DER may downregulate the local expression of some genes pivotally involved in the production of biologically active estrogens, thus contributing to preventing the estrogen-dependent initiation of breast cancer.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Schematic diagram depicting the genes coding for the enzymes involved in the classical steroidogenesis (solid line) and androgen alternative pathway (dashed line). CYP11A1, Cytochrome P450 family 11, subfamily A, polypeptide 1; CYP17A1, Cytochrome P450 Family 17 Subfamily A Member 1; CYP19A1, Cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1, alias aromatase; HSD3B2, 3β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/Δ5-4 isomerase type 2; HSD17B1, Hydroxysteroid 17β- Dehydrogenase 1; HSD17B2, Hydroxysteroid 17β-Dehydrogenase 2; HSD17B5, Testosterone 17β-Dehydrogenase 5; HSD17B6: Hydroxysteroid 17β-Dehydrogenase 6; HSD17B7, Hydroxysteroid 17β-Dehydrogenase 7; HSD17B12, Hydroxysteroid 17β-Dehydrogenase 12; SRD5A1, Steroid 5α-Reductase 1; SRE5A2, Steroid 5α-Reductase 2; STS: Steroid Sulfatase; SULT1A1, Sulfotransferase Family 1A Member 1.

Expression of HSD17B12 and VLDLR gene in breast epithelium and expression of HSD17B12 and AKR1C3 gene in abdominal adipose tissue before (Baseline), after DER (DER), or after usual diet (CTR). P-value refers to the difference evaluated by Wilcoxon paired test.

Correlation of HSD17B12 or VLDLR with some other genes involved in steroidogenesis after DER regimen or usual diet (CTR) in breast epithelium. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) and p-value are reported.

Correlation of HSD17B12 with some other genes involved in steroidogenesis after DER regimen or usual diet (CTR) in abdominal adipose tissue. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) and p-value are reported.

Read Counter : 332 Download : 43

Share Now

Abstract

Full text article

References

Authors

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Important Links

Contact Info

Article Sidebar

Abstract

Full text article

References

Authors

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Important Links

Contact Info