A Qualitative Study on Promoting Maternal Occupations and Health: Lived Experiences of Breast Cancer Survivors Within the Workforce Promoting maternal occupation and health

Main Article Content

Frances Drew Bosque https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-4022
Brinkley Angeli Deticio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-3548
Regina Clare Urbina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-0147
Paolo Miguel Bulan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-3224

Keywords

breast cancer, maternal health, occupational therapy, occupational science.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to understand the factors that support occupational engagement of working mothers who are breast cancer survivors based on their experiences. These factors are vital for occupational therapists and other health professionals in the promotion of their health and well-being. 


Methods: Using phenomenology, through in-depth interviews, this study explored experiences of mothers who survived breast cancer and have returned to work. Ten participants from ICanServe Foundation in Cebu, Philippines participated in one-on-one interviews.


Results: Thematic analysis identified three themes: (1) Baggage and uncertainties of life with cancer, (2) Lessons on grit, and (3) Beating the odds through occupational adaptation. Findings suggest that mothers face obstacles both in the home and in the workplace.


Conclusion: Obstacles identified include mother-child role reversals, physical and cognitive changes, stigma and discrimination in the workplace, and fear of death and uncertainty, which indicate the need for support. Findings based on their experiences can help inform collaborative efforts from occupational therapists and professionals across disciplines to support breast cancer survivors such as maternal support groups, informing employment or workplace policies, and community opportunities.

References

1. Wilcock AA. An occupational perspective of health. 2nded. Thorofare: SLACK; 2006. ISBN: 978-1-55-642754-1
2. Wilcock AA. Occupation for health. Br J Occup Ther. 1998;61(8):340–5. doi: 10.1177/030802269806100801.
3. Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(6):640–9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.6.640.
4. Wilcock AA. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46(1):1–11. doi: 10.1046/J.1440-1630.1999.00174.X.
5. American Occupational Therapy Association. The role of occupational therapy with health promotion. 2015; Available from: https://www.aota.org/~/media/Corporate/Files/AboutOT/Professionals/WhatIsOT/HW/Facts/FactSheet_HealthPromotion.pdf
6. Keesing S, Rosenwax L, McNamara B. The implications of women’s activity limitations and role disruptions during breast cancer survivorship. Women’s Heal. 2018;14. doi: 10.1177/1745505718756381.
7. Schulze PA. Filipino mothers’ beliefs about parenting: a question of independence. Contemp Issues Early Child. 2004;5(3). doi:10.2304/ciec.2004.5.3.10
8. Avarientos N. Being a mother: an important role of a woman [Internet]. World Vision; 2017 [cited 2021 Aug 9]. Available from: https://www.worldvision.org.ph/stories/being-a-mother-an-important-role-of-a-woman/.
9. Poduval J, Poduval M. Working mothers: how much working, how much mothers, and where is the womanhood? Mens Sana Monogr. 2009;7(1):63. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.41799.
10. Shah BK, Armaly J, Swieter E. Impact of parental cancer on children. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(8):4025–8. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11787.
11. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 4thed. London: SAGE; 2018. ISBN: 978-1-5063-3020-4
12. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
13. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
14. Merriam SB. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009. ISBN: 978-0-470-28354-7
15. American Cancer Society. Chemo brain [Internet]. Cancer.org.;2020 [cited 2021 Aug 9]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-side-effects/changes-in-mood-or-thinking/chemo-brain.html.
16. Janelsins MC, Heckler CE, Peppone LJ, Kamen C, Mustian KM, Mohile SG, et al. Cognitive complaints in survivors of breast cancer after chemotherapy compared with age-matched controls: an analysis from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(5):506-514. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5826
17. Durocher E, Gibson BE, Rappolt S. Occupational justice: A conceptual review. J Occup Sci. 2014;21(4):418–30. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2013.775692.
18. Wilcock AA, Townsend EA, eds. Occupational justice. In: Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa M, Cohn ES. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 12thed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia; 2013. p. 541–52.
19. Kinsella EA, Durocher E. Occupational justice: moral imagination, critical reflection, and political praxis. OTJR Occup Particip Heal. 2016;36(4):163–6. doi: 10.1177/1539449216669458.
20. Désiron HAM, Donceel P, Godderis L, Van Hoof E, de Rijk A. What is the value of occupational therapy in return to work for breast cancer patients? A qualitative inquiry among experts. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(2):267-280. doi: 10.1111/ECC.12209.
21. Totterdell P. Work schedules. In: Barling J, Kelloway EK, Frone MR, eds. Handbook of work stress. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2004. p. 35–62. ISBN: 0761929495
22. Fleischer A, Howell D. The experience of breast cancer survivors’ participation in important activities during and after treatments. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(8):470–8. doi: 10.1177/0308022617700652.
23. Hammell KRW. Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: An exploration. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81(1):39–50. doi: 10.1177/0008417413520489.
24. Hitch D, Pepin G. Doing, being, becoming and belonging at the heart of occupational therapy: An analysis of theoretical ways of knowing. Scand J Occup Ther. 2021;28(1):13–25. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2020.1726454.

Article Statistics :Views : 105 | Downloads : 26