<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" 
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" 
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"
         article-type="research-article" 
         dtd-version="1.2" 
         xml:lang="en">
  <?properties manuscript?>
  <?origin nihpa?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">abc</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Archives of Breast Cancer</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Arch Breast Cancer</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2383-0425</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2383-0433</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Farname Inc.</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32768/abc.2024114371-377</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">964</article-id>
      <article-version vocab="JAV" vocab-identifier="http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/RP-8-2008.pdf" 
        article-version-type="VoR" vocab-term="Version of Record">version-of-record</article-version>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Expression of CD44 in Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Its Correlation with Prognostic Parameters</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Punhani</surname>
            <given-names>Pallavi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Ahluwalia</surname>
            <given-names>Charanjeet</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Agrawal</surname>
            <given-names>Meetu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kandwal</surname>
            <given-names>Preeti</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>a</label>
        <institution>Department of Pathology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital</institution>
        <city>New Delhi</city>
        <country country="IN">India</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">
          <label>*</label>
          Address for correspondence: 
          <bold>Meetu Agrawal</bold>, 
          <institution>Department of Pathology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital</institution>, 
          <addr-line>New Delhi</addr-line>, 
          <country>India</country>
        </corresp>
        <fn fn-type="coi-statement">
          <p>No conflicts of interest exist regarding the publication of the present study.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2024">
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>371</fpage>
      <lpage>377</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-06-09">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2024-08-30">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-08-30">
          <day>30</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Archives of Breast Cancer</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Archives of Breast Cancer</copyright-holder>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>
            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License 
            (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xlink:title="Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License">
              Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
            </ext-link>), 
            which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.
          </license-p>
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
        </license>        
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/1011" content-type="pdf" xlink:title="PDF Full Text"/>
      <abstract>
        <title>Abstract</title>
        <p id="P1"><bold>Background:</bold> The study aims to evaluate CD44 expression as a cancer stem cell marker in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its correlation with prognostic parameters. Evaluation of CD44 immunoexpression in TNBC is vital for understanding tumor aggressiveness and determining its prognostic value.</p>
        <p id="P2"><bold>Methods:</bold> In this hospital-based cross-sectional study of 50 cases of primary triple-negative breast cancer patients, the tissue sections were subjected to immunohistochemical examination using the CD44 antigen marker. The proportion and intensity of CD44 immunostaining were assessed, and the correlation with prognostic markers such as histological grade, tumor size, and nodal status was examined.</p>
        <p id="P3"><bold>Results:</bold> CD44 expression was observed in 40% of the total cases with a statistically significant association with histological grade (P=0.002). Higher CD44 expression was noticed with increasing tumor grade. However, no statistical significance was observed with respect to tumor size and nodal status.</p>
        <p id="P4"><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The study suggests that CD44 immunoexpression may serve as a surrogate marker of breast cancer stem cells and may hold prognostic value in TNBC patients. However, further studies on larger samples are required to fully understand its role.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>CD44</kwd>
        <kwd>breast cancer</kwd>
        <kwd>triple-negative</kwd>
        <kwd>cancer stem cell</kwd>
        <kwd>prognostic</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>This study has not rесеivеd any funding suрроrt from the university or other grant bodies.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="P5">Breast cancer became the leading cause of global cancer in 2022, accounting for 23.8% of all cancer cases in women.<sup><xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref></sup> GLOBOCON statistics reveal an incidence rate of 192020 and a mortality rate of 98337 in India alone.<sup><xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref></sup> It is a highly heterogeneous disease with distinct biological and clinical behavior, and can be classified into subtypes based on histopathology type and molecular profile. Among various breast cancer subtypes, the prevalence of Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has significantly increased from 10% to 43%, particularly in India, according to various literature reports, which is much higher than in the Western world.<sup><xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P6">Treatment of TNBC is challenging due to the absence of targeted therapies, necessitating research for new treatment modalities. Newer agents include polymerase inhibitors targeting BRCA mutation carriers and, recently, immunotherapy. However, the majority of patients have a grim prognosis and still undergo primary ablative surgical procedures.<sup><xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P7">The 21st century has seen increased research on molecular genetics, epigenetics, and metabolic factors of cancer progression and treatment. In recent decades, the evaluation of cancer stem cells has gained attention. Therapeutic approaches only work if all cancer cells are eliminated during anti-tumor therapy.<sup><xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> However, cancer stem cells (CSCs) can self-renew and survive even after cytotoxic treatment, resulting in metastasis, drug resistance, and tumor recurrence. Accumulating evidence has shown the presence of a subpopulation of stem cells in breast cancer patients, particularly those belonging to the TNBC subtype. The presence of breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) is believed to increase aggressiveness and resistance to standard treatments.<sup><xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref></sup> Several stem cell markers, including CD44, CD24, CD133, ALDH1, and ABCG2, have been described in the literature, but their exact role in breast cancer remains unclear and controversial.<sup><xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P8">CD44, one of the most studied cancer stem cell markers, has been extensively investigated in breast carcinoma, but the existing data have been largely conflicting. Numerous studies have revealed its role in promoting carcinogenesis and regulating EMT, tumor invasion, therapy resistance, and overall survival.<sup><xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>-<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref></sup> On the contrary, some studies have failed to show a correlation between CD44 and other prognostic factors.<sup><xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P9">The purpose of the present study was to evaluate CD44 expression as a surrogate marker for BCSCs in primary TNBC patients and examine its association with established prognostic parameters such as histological grade, tumor size, and nodal status. Published studies have failed to reach a consensus on the prognostic role of CD44, particularly in the TNBC subtype. Moreover, there is a paucity of literature for such studies on Indian patients. Evaluation of CD44 immunoexpression in TNBC is vital for understanding tumor aggressiveness and determining its prognostic value.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="S2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="P10">A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. The participants were selected using a simple random sampling method wherein every triple-negative breast cancer case diagnosed from July 2023 to November 2023 had an equal and fair chance of being included in the research. This study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Review Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants following a detailed description of the purpose of the study.</p>
      <sec id="S3">
        <title>Sample size</title>
        <p id="P11">As per the study done by Collina et al.<sup><xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref></sup>, CD44 expression was detected in 143/160 breast cancer samples, i.e., 89.3 % of the specimens.</p>
        <p id="P12">Applying the formula to calculate sample size for qualitative variables according to prevalence: 1.96<sup>2</sup>×p×q/d<sup>2</sup></p>
        <p id="P13">where:</p>
        <p id="P14">p=prevalence (from previous studies)</p>
        <p id="P15">q=1−p</p>
        <p id="P16">d=marginal error (10%, &lt;0.2 of prevalence), hence d=0.1×0.89=0.09;</p>
        <p id="P17">sample size n=3.84×0.89×0.11/0.09×0.09</p>
        <p id="P18">n=47</p>
        <p id="P19">By using the above formula, the required sample size for the study was 47 participants. Thus, a total of 50 TNBC cases diagnosed on core needle biopsy or mastectomy specimens from July 2023 to November 2023 were enrolled in the study. Patient information was collected from the histopathology requisition forms, which were paper-based.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S4">
        <title>Inclusion criteria</title>
        <p id="P20">Histopathologically diagnosed cases of invasive breast cancer with TNBC subtype received in the Department of Pathology, VMMC, and Safdarjung Hospital were included in the study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S5">
        <title>Exclusion criteria</title>
        <p id="P21">Non-invasive cancer, including in situ cases, Metastatic lesions, sarcomas and ER+, PR+ or HER2 Neu positive cases were excluded from the study. Histological parameters were determined from H&amp;E-stained slides. Clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated for each tumor, including the patient's age at diagnosis, tumor laterality, tumor subtype, and histological grade using Modified Bloom-Richardson's grading system.<sup><xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> pTNM stage was assessed in all the breast cancer surgery specimens, wherein T is tumor size, N is nodal status, and M is metastasis.<sup><xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup></p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S6">
        <title>Immunohistochemical evaluation</title>
        <p id="P22">Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed for the assessment of ER, PR, HER2neu, and Ki-67. Only the samples negative for ER, PR, Her2neu, i.e., TNBC subtype, were included in this study. CD44 IHC was performed using a mouse monoclonal antibody (BC8, Biocare Clone). Paraffin blocks of tumor sections were cut on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, which were followed by deparaffinization. The sections were subjected to descending concentrations of alcohol for hydration. Then, 3% Hydrogen peroxide was added, followed by antigen retrieval using the pressure cooker heating technique. Primary Mouse monoclonal antibody was applied for approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour, followed by secondary antibody for 45 minutes. The slides were washed using Tris buffer after every step. Chromogen-DAB was used to highlight the antibody expression, and hematoxylin was used as a counterstain.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S7">
        <title>Immunohistochemistry interpretation</title>
        <p id="P23">The most representative areas were selected for IHC assessment by two pathologists, independently under a light microscope. CD44 expression in tumor cells was evaluated by considering the tumor percentage and intensity of immunopositivity in the cell membrane under low and high power (100× and 400×). There is no standardized scoring system for CD44 assessment; thus, we schematized our scoring system as follows:</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Percentage of positive tumor cells</th>
                <th>Intensity</th>
                <th>Score</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>≤10%</td>
                <td>None/weak</td>
                <td>0 (Negative)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>11–25%</td>
                <td>Moderate/strong</td>
                <td>1+ (Low positive)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>25–50%</td>
                <td>Moderate/strong</td>
                <td>2+ (Intermediate positive)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>>50%</td>
                <td>Moderate/strong</td>
                <td>3+ (High positive)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p id="P24">Each specimen was evaluated using the mentioned scoring system and subcategorized into negative (score=0), low positive (1+), intermediate positive (2+), and high positive (3+). CD44 expression and scores were then correlated with histological grade, T and N stage, wherever applicable.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S8">
        <title>Statistical analysis</title>
        <p id="P25">The presentation of the categorical variables was done in the form of numbers and percentages. Quantitative data were presented as means ± SD and as medians with 25th and 75th percentiles (interquartile range). The association between CD44 expression and prognostic parameters, such as tumor grade, T stage, and N stage, which were qualitative, was analyzed using Fisher's exact test, as at least one cell had an expected value of less than 5. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation of grade with CD44 score. Univariable logistic regression was used to find out significant risk factors for positive CD44. For statistical correlation, a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Due to a lack of a statistically significant association in univariable regression analysis, multivariable regression model was not performed. The data entry was done in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, and the final analysis was done with the use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, IBM, Chicago, USA, version 25.0.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="results" id="S9">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="S10">
        <title>Clinicopathological characteristics of tnbc patients</title>
        <p id="P26">The study included fifty cases of TNBC, including 31 core needle biopsy specimens, 17 mastectomy specimens, and one of the WLE and BCS specimens. The age of the patients ranged from 32 to 74 years, with a mean (SD) of 49.4 (10.4) years. Tumors involved the right breast in 26 (52%) cases, 23 (46%) involved the left side, and one was bilateral. The majority of the cases were grade 2 tumors (24 cases, 48%), followed by grade 3 (23 cases, 46%), and 3 (6%) were grade 1. Cases belonging to higher tumor grades were predominant, perhaps because of their triple negative status (47/50). pTNM staging could be assessed in 19 of the total 50 specimens. Tumor sizes less than 2 cm (T1) and 2 to 5 cm (T2) were considered as low T stage and comprised 12 (63.16%) of the cases. Also, 7 cases (36.84%) belonged to a higher T stage, i.e., T3/T4 category. Lymph node involvement was found in 7 (36.84%) of the patients, whereas 12 (63.16%) had a negative nodal stage. Clinicopathological features are summarized in Table 1.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Summary of Patients’ Clinicopathological Features</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Patient characteristics</th>
                <th>N (%)</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Age (years)*</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>≤45 years</td>
                <td>24 (48.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>&gt;45 years</td>
                <td>26 (52.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Laterality</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Bilateral</td>
                <td>1 (2.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Left</td>
                <td>23 (46.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Right</td>
                <td>26 (52.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Type of tissue</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>WLE</td>
                <td>1 (2.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BCS</td>
                <td>1 (2.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CNB</td>
                <td>31 (62.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>MRM</td>
                <td>17 (34.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 1</td>
                <td>3 (6.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 2</td>
                <td>24 (48.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 3</td>
                <td>23 (46.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T stage</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Low stage</td>
                <td>12 (63.16%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>High stage</td>
                <td>7 (36.84%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>N stage</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Negative nodal stage</td>
                <td>12 (63.16%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive nodal stage</td>
                <td>7 (36.84%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CD44</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Negative</td>
                <td>30 (60.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive</td>
                <td>20 (40.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CD44 score</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>30 (60.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1+</td>
                <td>7 (14.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2+</td>
                <td>6 (12.00%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3+</td>
                <td>7 (14.00%)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="TFN38">
              <p>* Mean ± SD, 49.4 ± 10.4; median (25th–75th percentile), 46.5(40–59); range, 32–75</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S11">
        <title>Cd44 expression in triple-negative breast cancer</title>
        <p id="P27">CD44 positive expression was observed in 20 (40%) of the total 50 cases (Figure 1).</p>
        <p id="P28">Also, 13 samples (26%) showed intermediate (score 2+) to high (score 3+) expression for CD44. In 7 samples (14%), low expression (score 1+) was observed. The remaining 30 cases (60%) showed a negative expression (score 0). (Figures 2A–D and 3A–D).</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Bar Graph Displaying Percentages of CD44 Positive and Negative Cases and Score Distribution in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (n=50)</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="2383-0433-11-04-371-g001.jpg">
            <alt-text>Figure 1</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <caption>
            <p>CD44 immunohistochemistry in breast cancer (400×). 2a-Score 0 (Negative), 2b-Score 1+: Tumor cells with CD44 expression in 11-25% of cells (Low positivity), 2c-2d-Score 2+: Tumor cells with CD44 expression in 26-50% of cells (Intermediate/Moderate positivity)</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="2383-0433-11-04-371-g002.jpg">
            <alt-text>Figure 2</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <fig id="F3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Score 3+ (High/Strong positivity): Tumor cells with strong CD44 expression in &gt;50% of cells. 3a- Low magnification (100×). 3b-3d- High magnification (400×)</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="2383-0433-11-04-371-g003.jpg">
            <alt-text>Figure 3</alt-text>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S12">
        <title>Association of cd44 with histological grade</title>
        <p id="P29">The study found a significant association between positive CD44 expression and histological grade (P value using Fisher's exact test=0.002, Table 2).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Association of CD44 expression with histological grade.</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>CD44</th>
                <th>Grade 1 (n=3)</th>
                <th>Grade 2 (n=24)</th>
                <th>Grade 3 (n=23)</th>
                <th>Total</th>
                <th>Low grade (1)</th>
                <th>High grade (2 and 3)</th>
                <th>Pvalue</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Negative</td>
                <td>3 (10%)</td>
                <td>19 (63.34%)</td>
                <td>8 (26.67%)</td>
                <td>30 (100%)</td>
                <td>3 (10%)</td>
                <td>27 (90%)</td>
                <td rowspan="2">0.002*</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>5 (25%)</td>
                <td>15 (75%)</td>
                <td>20 (100%)</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>20 (100%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="TFN39">
              <p>* Fisher's exact test</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p id="P30">Stronger CD44 expression was observed with increasing tumor grade. Of the total 20 cases with positive CD44 expression, the majority (15, 75%) were grade 3 tumors, followed by grade 2 (5, 25%), whereas none of the grade 1 (0%) cases showed positivity for CD44. On applying the univariable logistic regression model, the study failed to show a significant correlation between CD44 expression and tumor grade (P value using Fisher's exact test &gt;0.05, Table 4).</p>
        <p id="P31">The distribution of CD44 scores showed a similar pattern across different tumor grades. For cases with score 1+ i.e., low positive, the proportions were 0, 2 (28.5%), and 5 (71.5%) for cases at grades 1,2, and 3, respectively.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Association of CD44 score and distribution with histological grade.</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>CD44 score</th>
                <th>Grade 1 (n=3)</th>
                <th>Grade 2 (n=24)</th>
                <th>Grade 3 (n=23)</th>
                <th>Total</th>
                <th>Low grade (1)</th>
                <th>High grade (2 and 3)</th>
                <th>P value</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>3 (10%)</td>
                <td>19 (63.34%)</td>
                <td>8 (26.67%)</td>
                <td>30 (100%)</td>
                <td>3 (10%)</td>
                <td>27(90%)</td>
                <td rowspan="4">0.052*</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1+</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>2 (28.5%)</td>
                <td>5 (71.5%)</td>
                <td>7 (100%)</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>7 (100%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2+</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>2 (33.34%)</td>
                <td>4 (66.67%)</td>
                <td>6 (100%)</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>6 (100%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3+</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>1 (14.28%)</td>
                <td>6 (85.71%)</td>
                <td>7 (100%)</td>
                <td>0 (0%)</td>
                <td>7 (100%)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="TFN40">
              <p>* Fisher's exact test</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
        <p id="P32">Similarly, in cases with score 2+, the proportions were 0, 2 (33.34%), and 4 (66.67%), respectively. Lastly, for cases exhibiting strong positivity, i.e., score 3+, the highest number of cases belonged to Grade 3, i.e., 6 (85.71%), followed by Grade 2, 1 (14.28%). The P value associated with this distribution was marginally significant (P=0.052 using Fisher's exact test, Table 3).</p>
        <p id="P33">A stronger expression, both in intensity and tumor percentage, was noticed in the worst histological grade. Using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, a moderately positive correlation was observed between CD44 score and increasing tumor grade (Correlation coefficient of 0.485, P=0.0004).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S13">
        <title>Expression of cd44 in mastectomy specimens</title>
        <p id="P34">CD44 positivity was observed in 10/19 (52.63%) of the mastectomy specimens. The majority of the positive cases (5 cases, 50%) showed an intermediate immunoreactivity score (2+), followed by score 1+4 (40%). One case was stained high for CD44 with a score of 3+.</p>
        <p id="P35">CD44 was additionally correlated with tumor size and lymph node spread in these cases.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S14">
        <title>Association of cd44 immunoexpression with t stage</title>
        <p id="P36">No statistical significance was observed between CD44 immunoexpression and tumor stage (P value using Fisher's exact test=0.592). Logistic regression test was applied, and no significance was observed between CD44 expression and T stage (P value=0.494, Table 4). Ten out of the 19 surgery specimens showed a positive CD44 expression, with an equal number of cases belonging to the lower T1/T2 stage and the high T3/T4 stage.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <caption>
            <title>Univariate Logistic Regression to Evaluate Significant Risk Factors for Positive CD44 Expression.</title>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th>Variable</th>
                <th>Beta coefficient</th>
                <th>Standard error</th>
                <th>P value</th>
                <th>Odds ratio</th>
                <th>Odds ratio lower bound (95%)</th>
                <th>Odds ratio upper bound (95%)</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 1</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 2</td>
                <td>0.662</td>
                <td>1.802</td>
                <td>0.714</td>
                <td>1.938</td>
                <td>0.057</td>
                <td>66.308</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Grade 3</td>
                <td>2.523</td>
                <td>1.788</td>
                <td>0.158</td>
                <td>12.470</td>
                <td>0.375</td>
                <td>414.499</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>T stage</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Low stage</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>High stage</td>
                <td>0.789</td>
                <td>1.154</td>
                <td>0.494</td>
                <td>2.201</td>
                <td>0.229</td>
                <td>21.126</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>N stage</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Negative nodal stage</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>1.000</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive nodal stage</td>
                <td>−0.606</td>
                <td>1.220</td>
                <td>0.620</td>
                <td>0.546</td>
                <td>0.050</td>
                <td>5.964</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <table-wrap-foot>
            <fn id="TFN41">
              <p>On performing univariate regression, none of the variables were found to be significant risk factors for positive CD44 expression (P&gt;0.05).</p>
            </fn>
          </table-wrap-foot>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S15">
        <title>Association of cd44 immunoexpression with n stage</title>
        <p id="P37">The association between CD44 immuno-expression and nodal status did not show any statistical significance (P value using Fisher's exact test=1). Logistic regression analysis failed to show an association between CD44 positivity and N stage (P=0.620, Table 4). The majority of nodal negative cases (8 cases, 70%) displayed positive CD44 expression, compared to 2 (30%) cases of positive nodal involvement.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="discussion" id="S16">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="P38">Breast cancer treatment options have not yielded desirable outcomes for TNBC patients, necessitating the exploration of new prognostic parameters and therapeutic targets.<sup><xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref></sup> Recent studies on cancer stem cells (CSCs) have explored their unique properties, with CD44 being a key marker associated with increased cancer growth and chemotherapy resistance.<sup><xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref></sup> However, results have been contradictory due to variable methodology, lack of standardized quantification systems, and diverse isoforms of CD44 in stem cells.</p>
      <p id="P39">In the present study, CD44 expression was observed in 20 (40%) of the total 50 cases. A substantial number (13 cases, 26%) of positive cases showed a higher CD44 score with a moderate to strong expression. Our results were comparable to research conducted by Almasi et al., Liu et al., and Chekhun et al.<sup><xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref></sup> Collina et al. found a higher percentage of CD44 expression (89.37%) in TNBC. Such high positivity may be due to the absence of a lower tumor percentage limit for positive cases.<sup><xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P40">A statistically significant association was observed between CD44 immunoexpression and histological grade (P value&lt;0.05). Higher histological grades showed an elevated CD44 expression. Moreover, a comparison of CD44 score distribution showed a moderately positive correlation with increased tumor grade using the Spearman Rank correlation coefficient test. However, P value associated with this distribution was marginally significant with a P value of 0.052. Our findings were in concordance with a study done by McFarlane et al.<sup><xref rid="R21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref></sup> who observed an association between the overexpression of CD44 and increasing tumor grade. Similarly, a meta-analysis carried out by Xu et al. demonstrated a positive link between CD44 expression and clinical features including histological grade and basal subtype, leading to significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio=1.27; 95% CI: 1.04–1.55).<sup><xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P41">In our study, CD44 expression and score distribution failed to show a significant correlation with tumor size and nodal spread. Our findings were parallel to observations made by Jang et al.<sup><xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref></sup> However, they did not find any correlation between CD44 overexpression and tumor grade, which was contrary to our findings. Conversely, the systematic review done by Shadbad et al. concluded that CD44+CD24-/low expression is linked to advanced tumor stage, size, grade, metastasis, and lymphatic involvement in TNBC patients.<sup><xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref></sup> Another study by Zou et al. on 51 TNBC patients reported similar findings, suggesting the role of CD44 and CD24 as independent prognostic markers for patients with TNBC.<sup><xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref></sup> CD44 expression did not correlate with tumor size or nodal status in our study, as the majority of the cases were diagnosed early and belonged to lower tumor stages, i.e., T1/T2 and N0. A univariate regression analysis was also performed and none of the variables were found to be significant risk factors for positive CD44 expression (P value&gt;0.05).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="conclusions" id="S17">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="P42">CD44, a key breast cancer stem cell marker, has demonstrated a significant association with several prognostic factors in triple negative breast cancer. <sup><xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>,<xref rid="R26" ref-type="bibr">26</xref></sup> However, studies have reported controversial results. Our study recorded a positive expression of CD44 in 40% of TNBC samples with a statistically significant association with increased histological grade. No correlation was found between CD44 expression and tumor size or lymph node status. The study concludes that CD44 may be treated as a surrogate marker for BCSCs and may hold prognostic value in TNBC patients. Our research is one of the few in India to examine such an association. Further studies are required to verify these results using a larger sample size.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="S18">
      <title>Ethical considerations</title>
      <p id="P43">This study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics Review Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants following a detailed description of the purpose of the study.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>None.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <collab>WHO</collab>
          </person-group>. 
          <source>Globocan factsheets 2022</source>. 
          Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheet.pdf" xlink:title="Globocan 2022 World Factsheet">Globocan 2022 World Factsheet</ext-link>. (Last Accessed 1st April, 2024).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <collab>WHO</collab>
          </person-group>. 
          <source>Globocan factsheets India 2022</source>. 
          Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheet.pdf" xlink:title="Globocan 2022 India Factsheet">Globocan 2022 India Factsheet</ext-link>. (Last Accessed 1st April, 2024)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Akhtar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Triple Negative Breast Cancer Prevalence in Indian Patients over a Decade: A Systematic Review</article-title>. 
          <source>Int J Clin Biostat Biom</source>. 
          <year>2022</year>;<volume>8</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>045</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23937/2469-5831/1510045</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Mehrotra</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Breast cancer in India: Present scenario and the challenges ahead</article-title>. 
          <source>World J Clin Oncol</source>. 
          <year>2022</year>;<volume>13</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>209</fpage>-<lpage>218</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5306/wjco.v13.i3.209</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Skvortsova</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Cancer Stem Cells: What Do We Know about Them?</article-title>. 
          <source>Cells</source>. 
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>10</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1528</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells10061528</pub-id>).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Charafe-Jauffret</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ginestier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Iovino</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Breast cancer cell lines contain functional cancer stem sells with metastatic capacity and a distinct molecular signature</article-title>. 
          <source>Cancer Research</source>. 
          <year>2009</year>;<volume>69</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1302</fpage>–<lpage>1313</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>De Beça</surname><given-names>F F</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Caetano</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Gerhard</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Alvarenga</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Paredes</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Cancer stem cells markers CD44, CD24 and ALDH1 in breast cancer special histological types</article-title>. 
          <source>J. Clin. Pathol</source>. 
          <year>2013</year>;<volume>66</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>–<lpage>191</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201169</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ponta</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sherman</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Herrlich</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators</article-title>. 
          <source>Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol</source>. 
          <year>2003</year>;<volume>4</volume>:<fpage>33</fpage>–<lpage>45</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrm1004</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hebbard</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Steffen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zawadzki</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Fieber</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Howells</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Moll</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>CD44 expression and regulation during mammary gland development and function</article-title>. 
          <source>J Cell Sci</source>. 
          <year>2000</year>;<volume>113</volume>:<fpage>2619</fpage>–<lpage>2630</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Almási</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Nagy</surname><given-names>Á</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Krenács</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Lantos</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zombori</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Cserni</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>The prognostic value of stem cell markers in triple-negative breast cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Pathol Oncol Res</source>. 
          <year>2023</year>;<volume>29</volume>:<fpage>1611365</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/pore.2023.1611365</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Enrichment of CD44 in basal-type breast cancer correlates with EMT, cancer stem cell gene profile, and prognosis</article-title>. 
          <source>Onco Targets Ther</source>. 
          <year>2016</year> <month>Jan</month> <day>21</day>;<volume>9</volume>:<fpage>431</fpage>-<lpage>444</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/OTT.S97192</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Jang</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Jang</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Paik</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>WS</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Clinicopathological analysis of CD44 and CD24 expression in invasive breast cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Oncol Lett</source>. 
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>12</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>2728</fpage>-<lpage>2733</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2016.4987</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Collina</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Di Bonito</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Li Bergolis</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Prognostic Value of Cancer Stem Cells Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Biomed Res Int</source>. 
          <year>2015</year>;<volume>2015</volume>:<fpage>158682</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2015/158682</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <chapter-title>Breast</chapter-title>. In: 
          <source>Rosai and Ackerman Surgical Pathology</source>, 
          <edition>11th edition</edition>. 
          <publisher-loc>Philadelphia</publisher-loc>: 
          <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>; 
          <year>2017</year>. pp. <fpage>1434</fpage>-<lpage>1527</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hortobagyi</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Connolly</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>D’Orsi</surname><given-names>C J</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <chapter-title>Breast</chapter-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Edge</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Greene</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><etal/></person-group>, eds; 
          <source>American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC cancer staging manual</source>. 
          <edition>8th ed</edition>. 
          <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: 
          <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>; 
          <year>2017</year>. pp. <fpage>589</fpage>–<lpage>636</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Lehmann</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Bauer</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chakravarthy</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Shyr</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Identification of Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes and Preclinical Models for Selection of Targeted Therapies</article-title>. 
          <source>J Clin Invest</source>. 
          <year>2011</year>;<volume>121</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>2750</fpage>–<lpage>2767</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1172/JCI45014</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Reya</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Morrison</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Clarke</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Weissman</surname><given-names>IL</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells</article-title>. 
          <source>Nature</source>. 
          <year>2001</year>;<volume>414</volume>(<issue>6859</issue>):<fpage>105</fpage>-<lpage>111</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35102167</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Thapa</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>The Importance of CD44 as a Stem Cell Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Stem Cells Int</source>. 
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>2016</volume>:<fpage>2087204</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2016/2087204</pub-id>. 
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>YX</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zhai</surname><given-names>XJ</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LP</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Attempt Towards a Novel Classification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Immunohistochemical Markers</article-title>. 
          <source>Oncol Lett</source>. 
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>12</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>1240</fpage>–<lpage>1256</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2016.4778</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Chekhun</surname><given-names>SV</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zadvorny</surname><given-names>TV</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tymovska</surname><given-names>YO</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Anikusko</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Novak</surname><given-names>OE</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Polishchuk</surname><given-names>LZ</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>СD44+/CD24- markers of cancer stem cells in patients with breast cancer of different molecular subtypes</article-title>. 
          <source>Exp Oncol</source>. 
          <year>2015</year>;<volume>37</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>58</fpage>-<lpage>63</lpage>. 
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>McFarlane</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Coulter</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tibbits</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>O'Grady</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>McFarlane</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Montgomery</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>CD44 increases the efficiency of distant metastasis of breast cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Oncotarget</source>. 
          <year>2015</year>;<volume>6</volume>:<fpage>11465</fpage>–<lpage>11476</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>CD44 correlates with clinicopathological characteristics and is upregulated by EGFR in breast cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Int J Oncol</source>. 
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>49</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1343</fpage>-<lpage>1350</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ijo.2016.3639</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Abdoli Shadbad</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hosseinkhani</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Asadzadeh</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Derakhshani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Karim Ahangar</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hemmat</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>A Systematic Review to Clarify the Prognostic Values of CD44 and CD44+CD24- Phenotype in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: Lessons Learned and The Road Ahead</article-title>. 
          <source>Front Oncol</source>. 
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>11</volume>:<fpage>689839</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2021.689839</pub-id>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Association of CD44 and CD24 phenotype with lymph node metastasis and survival in triple-negative breast cancer</article-title>. 
          <source>Int J Clin Exp Pathol</source>. 
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>13</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>1008</fpage>-<lpage>1016</lpage>. 
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Obidiro</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Battogtokh</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Akala</surname><given-names>EO</given-names></name>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment Options and Limitations: Future Outlook</article-title>. 
          <source>Pharmaceutics</source>. 
          <year>2023</year>;<volume>15</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>1796</fpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pharmaceutics15071796</pub-id>. 
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ponti</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zaffaroni</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Pratesi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Petrangolini</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Coradini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>. 
          <article-title>Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties</article-title>. 
          <source>Cancer Res</source>. 
          <year>2005</year>;<volume>65</volume>(<issue>13</issue>):<fpage>5506</fpage>-<lpage>5511</lpage>. 
          doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0626</pub-id>. 
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>