<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" 
         xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" 
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"
         article-type="research-article" 
         dtd-version="1.2" 
         xml:lang="en">
  <?properties manuscript?>
  <?origin nihpa?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">abc</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Archives of Breast Cancer</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Arch Breast Cancer</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2383-0425</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2383-0433</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Farname Inc.</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32768/abc.1536324831353</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">1103</article-id>
      <article-version vocab="JAV" vocab-identifier="http://www.niso.org/publications/rp/RP-8-2008.pdf" 
        article-version-type="VoR" vocab-term="Version of Record">version-of-record</article-version>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Original Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Intertwined Impact of Marital Expectations, Body Image, and Sexual Satisfaction on Marital Quality of Life in Women with Breast Cancer</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Salehpour</surname>
            <given-names>Marzieh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name>
            <surname>Askari</surname>
            <given-names>Mohammad Reza</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>mrzaskari53@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">a</xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>a</label>
        <institution>Department of Psychology, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University</institution>, <city>Ahvaz</city>, <country country="IR">Iran</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">
          <label>*</label>
          Address for correspondence: Mohammad Reza Askari, Department of Psychology, Ahv.C., Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. Email: <email>mrzaskari53@gmail.com</email>
        </corresp>
        <fn fn-type="coi-statement">
          <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic" iso-8601-date="2025-04-07">
        <day>7</day>
        <month>4</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>317</fpage>
      <lpage>325</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-02-21">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>2</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2025-03-16">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>3</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-04-07">
          <day>7</day>
          <month>4</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Archives of Breast Cancer</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Archives of Breast Cancer</copyright-holder>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits copy and redistribution of the material in any medium or format or adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, except for commercial purposes.</license-p>
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
        </license>        
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.archbreastcancer.com/index.php/abc/article/view/1103" content-type="pdf" xlink:title="PDF Full Text"/>
      <abstract>
        <sec id="abs-s1">
          <title>Background:</title>
          <p id="P1">The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can profoundly affect women’s marital dynamics, frequently impacting body image, sexual satisfaction, and overall marital quality. This study sought to examine the relationships between marital expectations and body image with marital quality of life in women with breast cancer, with a particular focus on the mediating role of sexual satisfaction in these associations.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="abs-s2">
          <title>Methods:</title>
          <p id="P2">This study employed a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design, utilizing path analysis to examine the relationships between key variables, including marital quality of life, marital expectations, body image, and sexual satisfaction. The target population comprised all women with breast cancer attending subspecialty clinics in Ahvaz, Iran, with data collected from January to June 2024. A sample of 161 women with breast cancer was recruited via convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Marital Expectations Questionnaire, Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire, and Marital Intimacy Questionnaire. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and path analysis.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="abs-s3">
          <title>Results:</title>
          <p id="P3">The mean score for marital quality of life was 42.95 (SD, 8.89). The results indicated significant positive direct relationships between marital expectations and sexual satisfaction, body image and sexual satisfaction, body image and marital quality of life, and sexual satisfaction and marital quality of life among women with breast cancer (P&lt;0.001). However, no significant direct relationship was found between marital expectations and the quality of life in marriage. Furthermore, significant indirect relationships were observed between body image and marital quality of life, mediated by sexual satisfaction, and between marital expectations and marital quality of life, mediated by sexual satisfaction (P&lt;0.001).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="abs-s4">
          <title>Conclusion:</title>
          <p id="P4">This study highlights the intricate links between marital quality of life, sexual satisfaction, body image, and marital expectations in women with breast cancer, with sexual satisfaction as a key mediator. These insights call for holistic interventions, integrating psychological counseling, body image therapy, and couples’ support, to enhance relational well-being and overall quality of life.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>breast neoplasm</kwd>
        <kwd>quality of life</kwd>
        <kwd>body image</kwd>
        <kwd>sexual satisfaction</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>This research received no external funding.</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="P5">Cancer is one of the most significant health challenges today, being the second most common cause of death worldwide, following only heart-related conditions.<sup><xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref></sup> Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled cellular proliferation, resulting in the formation of a mass of cancerous cells, or a tumor.</p>
      <p id="P6">This uncontrolled growth is marked by cellular transformation and a loss of cellular differentiation. Approximately 1 in 5 men or women develops cancer in their lifetime.<sup><xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref></sup> Among the diverse cancer types, breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, representing 25% of all female cancers, and is considered the deadliest malignancy affecting women<sup><xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref></sup>, posing a significant global health concern.<sup><xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P7">A breast cancer diagnosis profoundly impacts all facets of a woman’s life, particularly sexual function and marital quality of life.<sup><xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">5</xref></sup> Treatments like mastectomy can alter body image and reduce sexual desire, while chemotherapy induces fatigue, hormonal changes, and vaginal dryness, impairing intimacy and straining marital bonds.<sup><xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref></sup> The family, a dynamic institution shaped by continuous, interactive communication, evolves over time and space, with these effects reverberating across spouses, children, and society<sup><xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref></sup>, highlighting the need for targeted support.</p>
      <p id="P8">Empirical evidence demonstrates the association between marital quality of life and a multitude of factors, some of which are addressed in this study. Marital expectations appear to be one such factor.<sup><xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref></sup> Expectations are categorized as 1 of 5 key cognitive phenomena (expectations, perceptions, attributions, standards, and assumptions) that, when inaccurate or excessive, can contribute to marital discord.<sup><xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref></sup> Marital expectations refer to the mental standards, hypotheses, pre-established frameworks, and perceived obligations and prohibitions couples hold about their spouse and relationship, which may or may not align with reality.<sup><xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P9">Furthermore, body image in women with breast cancer can significantly influence their marital quality of life.<sup><xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref></sup> Body image transcends personal identity, serving as a crucial component of social identity, particularly within the context of intimate relationships. Our perception of our bodies (i.e., how we see ourselves) can affect our ability to engage in social interactions and subsequently shape how others perceive and interact with us.<sup><xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref></sup> Specifically, within a marital context, changes in body image resulting from breast cancer treatment can impact a woman’s sense of attractiveness and femininity, influencing her confidence and intimacy with her partner. This aligns with social identity theory, which posits that individuals derive a sense of self from their perceived membership in social groups and that positive social identity is linked to psychological well-being.<sup><xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref></sup> Consistent with this, Noori and Johari Fard<sup><xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> demonstrated a relationship between body image and appearance with quality of life, while also finding an inverse relationship between obsessive beliefs and quality of life. Similarly, Rasekh Jahromi et al.<sup><xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup> found a significant association between sexual function and body image in women with breast cancer, further supporting the link between body image and relational well-being.</p>
      <p id="P10">Sexual satisfaction, defined as the degree of contentment from sexual interactions and mutual pleasure<sup><xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref></sup>, significantly influences the marital quality of life. Its absence compromises relationship stability, reducing resilience against life’s challenges and interpersonal difficulties.<sup><xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref></sup> Breast cancer-related challenges can diminish marital bonds, potentially leading to divorce, a critical family communication breakdown.<sup><xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>,<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P11">The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer present multifaceted challenges to women, extending far beyond physical health to deeply affect their psychological and emotional well-being, as well as their relational dynamics. Specifically, the experience can profoundly disrupt body image, sexual satisfaction, and marital relationships, often leading to heightened emotional distress, anxiety, and a diminished sense of self-worth. The psychological toll of altered body image, stemming from surgery, hair loss, or other treatment-related changes, can foster feelings of shame, insecurity, or loss of femininity, which may, in turn, erode sexual satisfaction and intimacy. These interconnected factors can contribute to a significant decline in marital quality of life, which is a critical component of overall well-being, as emotional disconnection or unmet relational expectations exacerbate the strain.</p>
      <p id="P12">While previous research has explored the individual impacts of body image, sexual satisfaction, and marital expectations on marital quality of life in women with breast cancer, a significant research gap exists in understanding the complex interrelationships between these factors, particularly the mediating role of sexual satisfaction in specific cultural contexts like Ahvaz. Prior studies have not comprehensively examined how body image and marital expectations indirectly affect marital quality of life through their impact on sexual satisfaction in this region, where cultural and religious norms may uniquely shape these dynamics. The present study addresses this gap by providing a novel mediation analysis that elucidates the specific pathways through which these factors interact in Ahvaz. Investigating these pathways, with sexual satisfaction as a potential mediating factor, is essential for developing targeted interventions that address both the emotional and relational dimensions of this experience in this cultural context. Therefore, this research aims to examine the relationship between marital expectations and body image with marital quality of life in women with breast cancer in Ahvaz, specifically exploring the mediating role of sexual satisfaction in this complex emotional and psychological landscape.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="methods" id="S2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p id="P13">This research utilized a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational approach, incorporating path analysis to explore possible associations among the studied variables. The explanatory variables included marital expectations and body image as predictors, with sexual satisfaction serving as a mediator. The outcome of interest was marital quality of life, which was assessed to understand how these predictors and the mediator affect it in women with breast cancer. The study population included all women diagnosed with breast cancer receiving care at specialized oncology clinics in Ahvaz, Iran, in 2024. Using a convenience sampling approach, 180 eligible participants were enrolled, with the sample size calculated to account for the study variables and ensure sufficient statistical power. Among those invited, 161 women (89.4%) agreed to participate and completed the questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were a confirmed breast cancer diagnosis, female gender, age between 25 and 65 years, ability to read and write in Persian, and provision of informed consent. Exclusion criteria included the presence of other severe chronic medical conditions (e.g., metastatic cancer, heart failure, advanced diabetes, or chronic kidney disease), a history of mental disorders or cognitive impairment that could affect informed consent or accurate questionnaire completion, participation in other similar research projects, and incomplete questionnaire completion. All participants provided written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the study’s purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. Participants were assured of the confidentiality of their responses, as data were anonymized to protect their privacy. Participation was voluntary with the option to withdraw at any time without penalty. The participants were provided with contact information of the research team and relevant support services.</p>
      <sec id="S2-1">
        <title>Research tools</title>
        <sec id="S2-1-1">
          <title>Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)</title>
          <p id="P14">Marital quality was measured using the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS). This 14-item instrument assesses 3 dimensions of marital adjustment: consensus (items 1 to 6), satisfaction (items 7 to 10), and cohesion (items 11 to 14). Responses were recorded on a Likert scale, utilizing a 6-point scale (ranging from 0 to 5) for all items except item 11, which employed a 5-point scale (0 to 4). Total scores, ranging from 0 to 69, indicate higher marital quality with increasing values.<sup><xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref></sup> The RDAS has demonstrated robust internal consistency in prior studies, with a reported Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85.<sup><xref rid="R21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref></sup>. In the current study, the RDAS maintained strong internal consistency, yielding a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.82.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="S2-1-2">
          <title>Marital Expectations Questionnaire</title>
          <p id="P15">The Marital Expectations Questionnaire, comprising 32 items, utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). Possible scores range from 0 to 128, with both extremely high and extremely low scores indicative of irrational and ineffective marital expectations. The instrument assesses expectations across 3 dimensions: expectations of the spouse as a friend and supporter, expectations regarding marital life, and expectations for a desirable relationship. Cronbach’s alpha was employed to establish the reliability of the Marital Expectations Questionnaire.<sup><xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref></sup> Ebrahimi<sup><xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref></sup> reported Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of 0.70, 0.80, and 0.91 for the respective subscales (expectations of spouse as friend and supporter, expectations of marital life, and expectations for a desirable relationship), with an overall alpha of 0.92 for the full questionnaire. In the present study, the Marital Expectations Questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, yielding a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.81.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="S2-1-3">
          <title>Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire</title>
          <p id="P16">The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ), developed by Cash<sup><xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref></sup>, is a 68-item self-report instrument designed to assess multiple facets of body image. The MBSRQ comprises 10 subscales: appearance evaluation, appearance orientation, fitness orientation, health evaluation, health orientation, disease orientation, body area satisfaction, mental weight preoccupation, and overweight preoccupation. A 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), is used for each subscale, with higher scores reflecting greater satisfaction with physical appearance and related conditions.<sup><xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref></sup> The psychometric properties of the MBSRQ, encompassing both validity and reliability, have been previously established.<sup><xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref></sup> In the current study, the MBSRQ exhibited satisfactory internal consistency, as evidenced by a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.79.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="S2-1-4">
          <title>Marital Intimacy Questionnaire</title>
          <p id="P17">The Marital Intimacy Questionnaire, developed by Hudson et al.<sup><xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref></sup>, was used to assess spousal satisfaction. This 25-item instrument includes items such as “I feel that my sexual life is unsatisfying” or “My husband does not satisfy me sexually,” using a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (always) to 5 (never). Total scores ranged from 25 to 125, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived marital intimacy. Previous research has reported a reliability coefficient of 0.77 using Cronbach’s alpha.<sup><xref rid="R26" ref-type="bibr">26</xref></sup> In the present study, the Marital Intimacy Questionnaire exhibited satisfactory internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="S2-2">
        <title>Statistical analyses</title>
        <p id="P18">The data analysis incorporated both descriptive and inferential statistical methods to examine relationships between variables. Inferential analyses included Pearson’s correlation coefficient and path analysis modeling to examine relationships between variables and test the hypothesized model. Fit indices such as TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index, indicating how well the model fits compared to a baseline model, with values above 0.90 suggesting a good fit), CFI (Comparative Fit Index, measuring model fit relative to a null model, with values over 0.90 indicating good fit), RFI (Relative Fit Index, comparing the model to a baseline, with higher values closer to 1 showing better fit), NFI (Normed Fit Index, assessing fit improvement over a null model, with values above 0.90 deemed acceptable), and RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, reflecting model error, with values below 0.08 indicating reasonable fit) were used to evaluate the model. All statistical procedures were performed using SPSS and AMOS version 27. Descriptive data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="results" id="S3">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p id="P19">The present study comprised 161 women diagnosed with breast cancer, with ages spanning from 25 to 65 years (45.3 ± 9.8). The sample exhibited heterogeneity in educational attainment: 28% had completed high school or less, 42% held a college or an associate degree, and 30% had a bachelor’s degree or higher. Disease duration ranged from 6 months to 10 years post-diagnosis, with a mean duration of 3.2 years (SD, 2.1). Furthermore, 68% of the participants were married for 2 to 40 years (18.5 ± 10.3). The remaining 32% of the sample were identified as single, divorced, or widowed at the time of data collection.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Mean, standard deviation (SD), and Pearson correlation coefficients of the research variables</title>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th>Variables</th>
              <th>Mean</th>
              <th>SD</th>
              <th>1</th>
              <th>2</th>
              <th>3</th>
              <th>4</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>1- Marital quality of life</td>
              <td>42.95</td>
              <td>8.89</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>2- Marital expectations</td>
              <td>77.26</td>
              <td>19.07</td>
              <td>0.21*</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>3- Body image</td>
              <td>79.74</td>
              <td>21.35</td>
              <td>0.30**</td>
              <td>0.36**</td>
              <td>1</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>4- Sexual satisfaction</td>
              <td>56.55</td>
              <td>11.60</td>
              <td>0.45**</td>
              <td>0.52**</td>
              <td>0.60**</td>
              <td>1</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <table-wrap-foot>
          <fn id="T1FN1">
            <p>* P&lt;0.05, ** P&lt;0.01</p>
          </fn>
        </table-wrap-foot>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="P20">Table 1 presents descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficients for the study variables: marital quality of life, marital expectations, body image, and sexual satisfaction. Mean scores suggest moderate levels of marital quality of life (42.95 ± 8.89) and sexual satisfaction (56.55 ± 11.60), with relatively higher scores for marital expectations (77.26 ± 19.07) and body image (79.74 ± 21.35). Correlation analyses revealed significant positive relationships between the variables. Marital quality of life positively correlated with sexual satisfaction (r = 0.45, P&lt;0.01), marital expectations (r = 0.21, P&lt;0.05), and body image (r = 0.30, P&lt;0.01). Marital expectations and body image were positively correlated (r = 0.36, P&lt;0.01). Both marital expectations (r = 0.52, P&lt;0.01) and body image (r = 0.60, P&lt;0.01) positively correlated with sexual satisfaction. The initial proposed model is presented in Figure 1.</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p id="P21">The Initial Proposed Model of the Research</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="2383-0433-12-03-317-g001.jpg">
          <alt-text>Figure 1</alt-text>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p id="P22">The initial model yielded the following indices: TLI=0.89, CFI=0.90, RFI=0.90, NFI=0.90, and RMSEA=0.37, indicating a suboptimal fit to the observed data. Between the proposed and final models, the direct path from marital expectations to marital quality of life was removed to improve fit. Conversely, the final model demonstrated superior fit, evidenced by TLI=0.99, CFI=0.99, RFI=0.99, NFI=0.99, and RMSEA=0.01. These metrics signify a substantial enhancement in model fit for the revised model, affirming its greater congruence with the data and its enhanced ability to represent the interrelationships among the variables.</p>
      <table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Path Coefficients for Direct and Indirect Effects Among the Research Variables in the Proposed and Final Models</title>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th rowspan="2">Path</th>
              <th rowspan="2">Type</th>
              <th colspan="2">Proposed model</th>
              <th colspan="2">Final model</th>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th>β</th>
              <th>P</th>
              <th>β</th>
              <th>P</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Marital expectations → Marital quality of life</td>
              <td>Direct</td>
              <td>0.02</td>
              <td>0.729</td>
              <td>-</td>
              <td>-</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Marital expectations → Sexual satisfaction</td>
              <td>Direct</td>
              <td>0.32</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.32</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Body image → Marital quality of life</td>
              <td>Direct</td>
              <td>0.21</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.22</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Body image → Sexual satisfaction</td>
              <td>Direct</td>
              <td>0.25</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.25</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Sexual satisfaction → Marital quality of life</td>
              <td>Direct</td>
              <td>0.38</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.39</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Marital expectations → Marital quality of life through the mediating role of sexual satisfaction</td>
              <td>Indirect</td>
              <td>0.10</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.19</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Body image → Marital quality of life through the mediating role of sexual satisfaction</td>
              <td>Indirect</td>
              <td>0.21</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
              <td>0.22</td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="P23">Table 2 presents the standardized path coefficients (β) and associated significance levels (P) for the direct and indirect effects among the research variables in the final model, offering insight into the strength and direction of these relationships. The results reveal that marital expectations exerted a significant positive direct effect on sexual satisfaction (β=0.32, P&lt;0.001), indicating that higher marital expectations were associated with a substantial increase in sexual satisfaction, specifically, a 0.32 SD increase for each SD increase in expectations. Similarly, body image had a significant positive direct effect on both marital quality of life (β=0.22, P&lt;0.001) and sexual satisfaction (β=0.25, P&lt;0.001), suggesting that better body image was linked to increases of 0.22 and 0.25 SDs in marital quality of life and sexual satisfaction, respectively, per 1 SD improvement in body image. In contrast, sexual satisfaction demonstrated a significant positive direct effect on marital quality of life (β=0.39, P&lt;0.001), implying that a 1-SD increase in sexual satisfaction corresponded to a 0.39-SD improvement in marital quality of life.</p>
      <p id="P24">Beyond direct effects, the analysis also uncovered significant indirect effects, which highlight the mediating role of sexual satisfaction. Marital expectations showed a significant positive indirect effect on marital quality of life through sexual satisfaction (β=0.19, P&lt;0.001), meaning that higher expectations indirectly contributed to a 0.19 SD increase in marital quality of life via their influence on sexual satisfaction. Likewise, body image exhibited a significant positive indirect effect on marital quality of life through sexual satisfaction (β=0.22, P&lt;0.001), indicating that a better body image indirectly enhanced marital quality of life by 0.22 SDs through the mediating role of sexual satisfaction.</p>
      <fig id="F2">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p id="P25">The Final Model of the Research</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="2383-0433-12-03-317-g002.jpg">
          <alt-text>Figure 2</alt-text>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="discussion" id="S4">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="P26">This study examined the interrelationships among marital expectations, body image perception, and marital quality of life in breast cancer patients, while specifically exploring how sexual satisfaction mediates these connections. The initial finding indicated no direct relationship between marital expectations and marital quality of life. This result contrasts with findings reported by Abbaspour et al.<sup><xref rid="R27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref></sup> and Brandão et al.<sup><xref rid="R28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref></sup> While previous studies, using correlation and regression analyses, found a significant direct relationship between marital expectations and marital quality of life, the present study employed path analysis. Although a significant correlation between these variables was also observed here using Pearson’s test, the path model, incorporating a mediating variable, elucidated the influence of marital expectations on marital quality of life through an indirect pathway. Thus, while marital expectations impact marital quality of life in this model, the effect is indirect. One possible explanation is that as individuals become more aware of the responsibilities and skills necessary for successful marital functioning, they may adjust their romanticized and idealistic expectations, such as anticipating constant passion, perfect harmony, or an effortless relationship, focusing instead on fostering a realistic and healthy partnership.<sup><xref rid="R28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref></sup> This shift may subsequently lead to decreased reported marital satisfaction if the adjusted expectations do not align with reality. It can be argued that the degree of marital dissatisfaction couples experience is tied to their marital expectations and beliefs, with those holding more realistic expectations likely facing less conflict and requiring less adaptation to sustain the relationship.<sup><xref rid="R27" ref-type="bibr">27</xref></sup></p>
      <p id="P27">The results revealed a direct, positive relationship between body image and marital quality of life. This finding aligns with the results reported by previous research.<sup><xref rid="R29" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>,<xref rid="R30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref></sup> This outcome may reflect the significant concerns regarding body image experienced by women with breast cancer. These concerns are influenced by social desirability bias, with some women feeling shame about their altered appearance and struggling to acknowledge these anxieties in the context of a breast cancer diagnosis. Surgical procedures, wounds, and related physical changes contribute to these preoccupations and worries. Such body image concerns can negatively impact spousal relationships and marital quality. These women may perceive a diminished capacity to fulfill their sexual identity and roles within their families and communities due to these bodily changes, potentially leading to feelings of fear, anxiety, and worthlessness. Breast cancer treatments often result in specific physical alterations, including breast deformity, surgical scarring, and skin changes secondary to radiotherapy. Furthermore, adjuvant therapies—additional treatments like chemotherapy or hormone therapy given after primary treatment to lower the risk of cancer recurrence—can frequently lead to weight gain.<sup><xref rid="R30" ref-type="bibr">30</xref></sup> These physical changes are closely associated with body image concerns in women with breast cancer and may contribute to decreased mental well-being, diminished marital quality, and psychological distress stemming from a negative self-perception.</p>
      <p id="P28">Furthermore, the results indicated a direct, positive relationship between sexual satisfaction and marital quality of life. This finding is consistent with the results found in prior research.<sup><xref rid="R31" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>,<xref rid="R32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref></sup> A satisfying sexual relationship is often predicated on a foundation of intimacy between partners, facilitating open communication about sexual needs and desires.<sup><xref rid="R28" ref-type="bibr">28</xref></sup> Conversely, a lack of sexual intimacy can contribute to tension and dissatisfaction within the marriage. The strength of marital bonds is often linked to satisfying sexual experiences, highlighting the close connection between satisfaction with the marital relationship and satisfaction with the sexual relationship.<sup><xref rid="R32" ref-type="bibr">32</xref></sup> Sexual activity is a crucial aspect of well-being and should be given due consideration in social health, and medical and therapeutic interventions. In women, breast cancer diagnosis can negatively impact sexual satisfaction, which, in turn, will affect marital quality of life. Therefore, neglecting this issue can lead to sexual dissatisfaction and potentially compromise marital relationships.</p>
      <p id="P29">Additionally, the findings indicate an indirect association between marital expectations and marital quality of life, with sexual satisfaction acting as a mediator. Given the novelty of this specific mediational pathway, there is a paucity of directly comparable studies. The initial analysis revealed no direct link between marital expectations and marital quality of life; however, the indirect effect via sexual satisfaction suggests that marital expectations exert an influence on marital quality of life by modulating sexual satisfaction. This supports the assertion that sexual satisfaction effectively mediates the relationship between marital expectations and marital quality of life. Within the framework of path analysis, the presence of a mediating variable can explain the lack of statistical significance in the direct effect, as the mediator captures the independent variable’s impact on the dependent variable. In this study, although body image did not exhibit a direct association with marital quality of life, its effect was entirely mediated through sexual satisfaction. Broadly, women with breast cancer may develop new expectations concerning emotional, physical, and psychological support from their partners. These expectations can shape their sexual satisfaction, potentially increasing when partners meet these needs. As a vital element of marital life, sexual satisfaction may serve as a mediator, channeling the influence of marital expectations to marital quality of life. Women reporting higher levels of sexual satisfaction are more likely to perceive enhanced marital quality.<sup><xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref></sup> When partners respond adeptly to these expectations—such as by providing greater attention to the woman’s emotional and physical needs following cancer diagnosis—sexual satisfaction can improve, thereby enhancing marital quality of life.</p>
      <p id="P30">Moreover, the analysis identified an indirect relationship between body image and marital quality of life, with sexual satisfaction serving as a mediator. Although directly comparable research on this specific mediational pathway remains limited, the direct findings demonstrated a significant association between body image and marital quality of life. The indirect effect suggests that body image influences marital quality of life among women with breast cancer by modulating sexual satisfaction. Physical alterations resulting from breast cancer, such as those induced by surgery and associated treatments, can profoundly impact a woman’s body image. Dissatisfaction with physical appearance may erode sexual self-confidence, subsequently reducing satisfaction with sexual activity.<sup><xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref></sup> Sexual satisfaction acts as a mediating variable, elucidating the intricate relationship between body image and marital quality of life. Women with a positive body image are more likely to report greater satisfaction in their sexual relationships, which contributes to enhanced marital quality. Conversely, a negative body image may diminish libido, directly lowering sexual satisfaction and ultimately adversely affecting marital quality of life.<sup><xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> Women who perceive themselves as more attractive due to a positive body image may experience heightened sexual satisfaction, thereby improving their marital quality of life.</p>
      <p id="P31">This study was conducted on women diagnosed with breast cancer residing in Ahvaz, limiting the generalizability of the findings to women with breast cancer in other regions, particularly those with differing cultural or socio-personal characteristics. Notably, this research did not explicitly examine the influence of cultural factors or religious beliefs on the variables studied, despite their potential to significantly shape perceptions of marital quality of life, marital expectations, body image, and sexual satisfaction. In a context like Ahvaz, where Islamic religious beliefs and cultural expectations may emphasize modesty, familial roles, and resilience, these factors could influence how women perceive their post-diagnosis body image or navigate marital dynamics and sexual intimacy.</p>
      <p id="P32">To address these gaps, future research could employ longitudinal designs to track how these variables evolve over time—from diagnosis through treatment and recovery—offering deeper insights into their dynamic interplay. Additionally, cross-cultural comparisons, such as between women in Middle Eastern contexts like Ahvaz and those in Western or East Asian settings, could reveal how religious beliefs and cultural norms—such as Islamic values versus secular individualism—differentially impact these psychological and relational outcomes. Specifically, exploring the role of religious coping mechanisms, such as prayer or spiritual support, alongside cultural expectations around gender roles and sexuality, could enhance our understanding and guide the development of culturally and spiritually sensitive interventions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="conclusions" id="S5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="P33">The findings of this study illuminate the complex interplay of factors influencing marital quality of life among women with breast cancer. The significant direct relationships observed between sexual satisfaction and both marital expectations and body image underscore the importance of addressing these domains in interventions to enhance intimacy and well-being. The direct link between body image and marital quality of life highlights the vulnerability of self-perception post-cancer treatment, impacting relationship dynamics. The mediating role of sexual satisfaction in the relationships between body image, marital expectations, and marital quality of life clarifies these influence pathways. Clinicians can use these insights to design holistic interventions—such as therapy focusing on communication and sexual health, alongside body image support—to improve marital quality of life. The absence of a direct relationship between marital expectations and marital quality of life, with a significant indirect effect via sexual satisfaction, suggests that clinicians should prioritize enhancing sexual intimacy to mitigate unmet expectations, effectively supporting women and their partners.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="S6">
      <title>Ethical considerations</title>
      <p id="P34">This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Islamic Azad University Ahvaz Branch (IR.IAU.AHVAZ.REC.1403.177).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p id="P35">The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all those who supported and contributed to the completion of this work, who provided valuable insights or assistance during the study.</p>
    </ack>
    <sec sec-type="data-availability">
      <title>Data availability</title>
      <p id="P36">Data are available upon reasonable request.</p>
    </sec>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="R1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Laversanne</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Weiderpass</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Soerjomataram</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide</article-title>.
          <source>Cancer</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>127</volume>(<issue>16</issue>):<fpage>3029</fpage>-<lpage>3030</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cncr.33587</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Diori Karidio</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sanlier</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Reviewing cancer’s biology: an eclectic approach</article-title>.
          <source>J Egypt Natl Canc Inst</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>32</fpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s43046-021-00088-y</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Łukasiewicz</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Czeczelewski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Forma</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Baj</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sitarz</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Stanisławek</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Breast Cancer-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies-An Updated Review</article-title>.
          <source>Cancers (Basel)</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>13</volume>(<issue>17</issue>).
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cancers13174287</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Arnold</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Rumgay</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mafra</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Laversanne</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040</article-title>.
          <source>Breast</source>.
          <year>2022</year>;<volume>66</volume>:<fpage>15</fpage>-<lpage>23</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Azarnia</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Naderi</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Makvandi</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Prediction of Distress Tolerance in Patients with Breast Cancer based on Anger Rumination and Physical Health: Using an Artificial Neural Network: Distress tolerance in patients with breast cancer</article-title>.
          <source>Archives of Breast Cancer</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>11</volume>(<issue>3</issue>).
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32768/abc.2024113236-244</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hinyard</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Wirth</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Clancy</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Schwartz</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The effect of marital status on breast cancer-related outcomes in women under 65: A SEER database analysis</article-title>.
          <source>Breast</source>.
          <year>2017</year>;<volume>32</volume>:<fpage>13</fpage>-<lpage>17</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.breast.2016.12.008</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ruan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Dynamic changes in marital status and survival in women with breast cancer: a population-based study</article-title>.
          <source>Sci Rep</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>11</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>5421</fpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-84996-y</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Arocho</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Changes in expectations to marry and to divorce across the transition to adulthood</article-title>.
          <source>Emerg Adulthood</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>217</fpage>-<lpage>228</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/2167696819879008</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>McGarry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Maqsood</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Spousal Role Expectations and Marital Conflict: Perspectives of Men and Women</article-title>.
          <source>J Interpers Violence</source>.
          <year>2022</year>;<volume>37</volume>(<issue>9-10</issue>):<fpage>Np7082</fpage>-<lpage>Np7108</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0886260520966667</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Guzzo</surname><given-names>KB</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>A Research Brief on Prospective Marital Expectations among Cohabitors with Initial Marital Intentions</article-title>.
          <source>J Fam Issues</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>41</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<fpage>1979</fpage>-<lpage>2001</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Tabarzan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hooman</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Bakhtiarpour</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The Mediating Role of Sexual Satisfaction in the Relationships of Body Mass Index and Spiritual Well-being with Quality of Married Life in Women with Breast Cancer: Quality of married life in women with BC</article-title>.
          <source>Archives of Breast Cancer</source>.
          <year>2022</year>;<volume>10</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>48</fpage>-<lpage>56</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32768/abc.202310148-56</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Merino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Tornero-Aguilera</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Rubio-Zarapuz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Villanueva-Tobaldo</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Martín-Rodríguez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Clemente-Suárez</surname><given-names>VJ</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Body Perceptions and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Impact of Social Media and Physical Measurements on Self-Esteem and Mental Health with a Focus on Body Image Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Cultural and Gender Factors</article-title>.
          <source>Healthcare (Basel)</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>12</volume>(<issue>14</issue>).
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/healthcare12141396</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Brance</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chatzimpyros</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Bentall</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Increased social identification is linked with lower depressive and anxiety symptoms among ethnic minorities and migrants: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>.
          <source>Clin Psychol Rev</source>.
          <year>2023</year>;<volume>99</volume>:<fpage>102216</fpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102216</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Noori</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The Relationship Between Body Dysmorphic Disorder and Depressive Symptoms with Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with Vitiligo</article-title>.
          <source>J Clin Res Paramed Sci</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>13</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>e148595</fpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5812/jcrps-148595</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Rasekh Jahromi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ranjbar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Naseripour</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Rahmanian</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Jamali</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Body image and sexual function in women with breast cancer</article-title>.
          <source>Sexual and Relationship Therapy</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>39</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>894</fpage>-<lpage>904</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14681994.2022.2097212</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Blondeel</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mirandola</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Gios</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Folch</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Noestlinger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Cordioli</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Sexual satisfaction, an indicator of sexual health and well-being? Insights from STI/HIV prevention research in European men who have sex with men</article-title>.
          <source>BMJ Glob Health</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>5</issue>).
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013285</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Dekker</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Matthiesen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Cerwenka</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Otten</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Briken</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Health, Sexual Activity, and Sexual Satisfaction</article-title>.
          <source>Dtsch Arztebl Int</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>117</volume>(<issue>39</issue>):<fpage>645</fpage>-<lpage>652</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3238/arztebl.2020.0645</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Zimmermann</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Intimate Relationships Affected by Breast Cancer: Interventions for Couples</article-title>.
          <source>Breast Care (Basel)</source>.
          <year>2015</year>;<volume>10</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>102</fpage>-<lpage>108</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000381966</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Valente</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chirico</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Ottoboni</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Chattat</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Relationship Dynamics among Couples Dealing with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review</article-title>.
          <source>Int J Environ Res Public Health</source>.
          <year>2021</year>;<volume>18</volume>(<issue>14</issue>).
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph18147288</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Busby</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Christensen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Crane</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Larson</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and no distressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales</article-title>.
          <source>Journal of Marital and Family Therapy</source>.
          <year>1995</year>;<volume>21</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>289</fpage>-<lpage>308</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Maroufizadeh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Omani-Samani</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hosseini</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Almasi-Hashiani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sepidarkish</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Amini</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The Persian version of the revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS): a validation study in infertile patients</article-title>.
          <source>BMC Psychol</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>8</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>6</fpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40359-020-0375-z</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ebrahimi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Goudarzi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Isanejad</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The effectiveness of pre-marriage counseling through the couples care program «CARE» on expectations and communicational beliefs in marriage applicants</article-title>.
          <source>Family Counseling and Psychotherapy</source>.
          <year>2019</year>;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>217</fpage>-<lpage>236</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34785/J015.2019.023</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="book">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Cash</surname><given-names>TF</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <source>The multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. MBSRQ User’s Manual‚ Third Revision</source>.
          <year>2000</year>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Shemshadi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Shams</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Sahaf</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Shamsipour Dehkordi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Zareian</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Moslem</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ) Among Iranian Elderly</article-title>.
          <source>Iranian Journal of Ageing</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>15</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>298</fpage>-<lpage>311</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32598/sija.15.3.61.13</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Hudson</surname><given-names>WW</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>DF</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Crosscup</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships</article-title>.
          <source>The Journal of Sex Research</source>.
          <year>1981</year>;<volume>17</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>157</fpage>-<lpage>174</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00224498109551110</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Bahrami</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Yaghoobzadeh</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Nia</surname><given-names>Sharif</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Soliemani</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Haghdoost</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Larsons Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Sample of Iranian Infertile Couples</article-title>.
          <source>Iranian Journal of Epidemiology</source>.
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>12</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>18</fpage>-<lpage>31</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Abbaspour</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Vardanjani</surname><given-names>Karimi</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Khojastehmehr</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The Mediating Role of Fulfillment of Marital Expectations in the effect of Marital Satisfaction on High Marital Expectations, Optimism and Relationship Self-Efficacy in University Personell</article-title>.
          <source>Positive Psychology Research</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>5</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>-<lpage>14</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22108/ppls.2020.116042.1684</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R28">
        <label>28</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Brandão</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Brites</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Hipólito</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Pires</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Dyadic coping, marital adjustment and quality of life in couples during pregnancy: an actor-partner approach</article-title>.
          <source>J Reprod Infant Psychol</source>.
          <year>2020</year>;<volume>38</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>49</fpage>-<lpage>59</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02646838.2019.1578950</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R29">
        <label>29</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>KavehFarsani</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Worthington</surname><given-names>EL</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Direct Effects of Marital Empathy, Body Image, and Perceived Social Support on Quality of Life of Married Women with Breast Cancer and the Mediating Role of Perceived Marital Quality</article-title>.
          <source>Iran J Psychiatry</source>.
          <year>2024</year>;<volume>19</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>70</fpage>-<lpage>78</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14340</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R30">
        <label>30</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Meltzer</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>McNulty</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Body image and marital satisfaction: evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction</article-title>.
          <source>J Fam Psychol</source>.
          <year>2010</year>;<volume>24</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>156</fpage>-<lpage>164</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0019063</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R31">
        <label>31</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Ziaee</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Jannati</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Mobasheri</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Taghavi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Abdollahi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Modanloo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <etal/>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>The Relationship between Marital and Sexual Satisfaction among Married Women Employees at Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran</article-title>.
          <source>Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci</source>.
          <year>2014</year>;<volume>8</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>44</fpage>-<lpage>51</lpage>.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="R32">
        <label>32</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
          <person-group person-group-type="author">
            <name><surname>Masoumi</surname><given-names>SZ</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Garousian</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Khani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Oliaei</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name>
            <name><surname>Shayan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
          </person-group>.
          <article-title>Comparison of Quality of Life, Sexual Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction between Fertile and Infertile Couples</article-title>.
          <source>Int J Fertil Steril</source>.
          <year>2016</year>;<volume>10</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>290</fpage>-<lpage>296</lpage>.
          <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22074/ijfs.2016.5045</pub-id>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>